[PATCH] D24595: [lib/LTO] Remove now unneded hack for undefined symbols

[Davide Italiano via llvm-commits]

davide added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24595#543368, @mehdi_amini wrote:

> I'll reformulate: what is the semantic of having a prevailing resolution for an undefined symbol?
>  If there is none we should error (or at least assert).


I don't think an undefined can have a prevailing resolution, at least in lld and gold.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D24595