[llvm] r278161 - Fix the runtime error caused by "Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion".

Steven Wu via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 13 12:01:42 PDT 2016


ping. Is there any update on this?

Steven

> On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Steven, thanks for providing the testcase. I can reproduce the error.
> Will look at it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wei.
> 
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:
>> Hi Wei
>> 
>> I found a fallout from this commit. Here is a reduced testcase:
>> 
>> $ cat bugpoint-reduced-simplified.ll
>> target datalayout = "e-m:o-p:32:32-f64:32:64-f80:128-n8:16:32-S128"
>> target triple = "i386-apple-macosx10.12.0"
>> 
>> ; Function Attrs: nounwind optsize ssp
>> define void @Foo() {
>> entry:
>>  switch i2 undef, label %sw.epilog102 [
>>    i2 -2, label %sw.bb28
>>  ]
>> 
>> sw.bb28:                                          ; preds = %entry
>>  %0 = load i8*, i8** undef, align 2
>>  %add.ptr1.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* undef, i32 -1
>>  %add.ptr4.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %0, i32 -1
>>  %cmp.i = icmp ult i8* undef, %0
>>  %add.ptr4.add.ptr1.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i8* %add.ptr4.i, i8* %add.ptr1.i
>>  br label %while.cond.i
>> 
>> while.cond.i:                                     ; preds = %while.cond.i, %sw.bb28
>>  %currPtr.1.i = phi i8* [ %incdec.ptr.i, %while.cond.i ], [ %add.ptr4.add.ptr1.i, %sw.bb28 ]
>>  %incdec.ptr.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %currPtr.1.i, i32 1
>>  %1 = load i8, i8* %incdec.ptr.i, align 1
>>  br label %while.cond.i
>> 
>> sw.epilog102:                                     ; preds = %entry
>>  unreachable
>> }
>> 
>> $ bugpoint-reduced-simplified.ll -loop-reduce -disable-output
>> Assertion failed: (S1->getType() == S2->getType() && "Cannot create binary operator with two operands of differing type!"), function Create, file /Users/steven/dev/trunk/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp, line 2137.
>> 
>> It seems SCEV trying to fold i8* %add.ptr4.i into *i8 subtract i32 1 which causes the assertion. Can you take a look?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Steven
>> 
>>> On Aug 9, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Author: wmi
>>> Date: Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
>>> New Revision: 278161
>>> 
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278161&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fix the runtime error caused by "Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion".
>>> 
>>> The patch is to fix the bug in PR28705. It was caused by setting wrong return
>>> value for SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion. The return values of findExistingExpansion
>>> have different meanings when the function is used in different ways so it is easy to make
>>> mistake. The fix creates two new interfaces to replace SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion,
>>> and specifies where each interface is expected to be used.
>>> 
>>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22942
>>> 
>>> Added:
>>>   llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll
>>> Modified:
>>>   llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h
>>>   llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
>>>   llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
>>> 
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>> #ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_SCALAREVOLUTIONEXPANDER_H
>>> #define LLVM_ANALYSIS_SCALAREVOLUTIONEXPANDER_H
>>> 
>>> +#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
>>> #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
>>> #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionNormalization.h"
>>> #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetFolder.h"
>>> @@ -268,7 +269,15 @@ namespace llvm {
>>> 
>>>    void setChainedPhi(PHINode *PN) { ChainedPhis.insert(PN); }
>>> 
>>> -    /// \brief Try to find LLVM IR value for S available at the point At.
>>> +    /// Try to find existing LLVM IR value for S available at the point At.
>>> +    Value *getExactExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At,
>>> +                                     Loop *L);
>>> +
>>> +    /// Try to find the ValueOffsetPair for S. The function is mainly
>>> +    /// used to check whether S can be expanded cheaply.
>>> +    /// If this returns a non-None value, we know we can codegen the
>>> +    /// `ValueOffsetPair` into a suitable expansion identical with S
>>> +    /// so that S can be expanded cheaply.
>>>    ///
>>>    /// L is a hint which tells in which loop to look for the suitable value.
>>>    /// On success return value which is equivalent to the expanded S at point
>>> @@ -276,7 +285,9 @@ namespace llvm {
>>>    ///
>>>    /// Note that this function does not perform an exhaustive search. I.e if it
>>>    /// didn't find any value it does not mean that there is no such value.
>>> -    Value *findExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At, Loop *L);
>>> +    ///
>>> +    Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair>
>>> +    getRelatedExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At, Loop *L);
>>> 
>>>  private:
>>>    LLVMContext &getContext() const { return SE.getContext(); }
>>> 
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
>>> @@ -1892,8 +1892,18 @@ unsigned SCEVExpander::replaceCongruentI
>>>  return NumElim;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -Value *SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S,
>>> -                                           const Instruction *At, Loop *L) {
>>> +Value *SCEVExpander::getExactExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S,
>>> +                                               const Instruction *At, Loop *L) {
>>> +  Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair> VO =
>>> +      getRelatedExistingExpansion(S, At, L);
>>> +  if (VO && VO.getValue().second == nullptr)
>>> +    return VO.getValue().first;
>>> +  return nullptr;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair>
>>> +SCEVExpander::getRelatedExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At,
>>> +                                          Loop *L) {
>>>  using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
>>> 
>>>  SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitingBlocks;
>>> @@ -1911,22 +1921,23 @@ Value *SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansi
>>>      continue;
>>> 
>>>    if (SE.getSCEV(LHS) == S && SE.DT.dominates(LHS, At))
>>> -      return LHS;
>>> +      return ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair(LHS, nullptr);
>>> 
>>>    if (SE.getSCEV(RHS) == S && SE.DT.dominates(RHS, At))
>>> -      return RHS;
>>> +      return ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair(RHS, nullptr);
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  // Use expand's logic which is used for reusing a previous Value in
>>>  // ExprValueMap.
>>> -  if (Value *Val = FindValueInExprValueMap(S, At).first)
>>> -    return Val;
>>> +  ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair VO = FindValueInExprValueMap(S, At);
>>> +  if (VO.first)
>>> +    return VO;
>>> 
>>>  // There is potential to make this significantly smarter, but this simple
>>>  // heuristic already gets some interesting cases.
>>> 
>>>  // Can not find suitable value.
>>> -  return nullptr;
>>> +  return None;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper(
>>> @@ -1935,7 +1946,7 @@ bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHe
>>> 
>>>  // If we can find an existing value for this scev avaliable at the point "At"
>>>  // then consider the expression cheap.
>>> -  if (At && findExistingExpansion(S, At, L) != nullptr)
>>> +  if (At && getRelatedExistingExpansion(S, At, L))
>>>    return false;
>>> 
>>>  // Zero/One operand expressions
>>> @@ -1983,7 +1994,7 @@ bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHe
>>>    // involving division. This is just a simple search heuristic.
>>>    if (!At)
>>>      At = &ExitingBB->back();
>>> -    if (!findExistingExpansion(
>>> +    if (!getRelatedExistingExpansion(
>>>            SE.getAddExpr(S, SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 1)), At, L))
>>>      return true;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
>>> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ Value *IndVarSimplify::expandSCEVIfNeede
>>>                                          Type *ResultTy) {
>>>  // Before expanding S into an expensive LLVM expression, see if we can use an
>>>  // already existing value as the expansion for S.
>>> -  if (Value *ExistingValue = Rewriter.findExistingExpansion(S, InsertPt, L))
>>> +  if (Value *ExistingValue = Rewriter.getExactExistingExpansion(S, InsertPt, L))
>>>    if (ExistingValue->getType() == ResultTy)
>>>      return ExistingValue;
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll?rev=278161&view=auto
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll (added)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
>>> +; PR28705
>>> +; RUN: opt < %s -indvars -S | FileCheck %s
>>> +
>>> +; Check IndVarSimplify replaces the exitval use of the induction var "%inc.i.i"
>>> +; with "%.sroa.speculated + 1".
>>> +;
>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
>>> +; CHECK: %[[EXIT:.+]] = sub i32 %.sroa.speculated, -1
>>> +; CHECK: %DB.sroa.9.0.lcssa = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %[[EXIT]], %loopexit ]
>>> +;
>>> +define void @foo(i32 %sub.ptr.div.i, i8* %ref.i1174) local_unnamed_addr {
>>> +entry:
>>> +  %cmp.i1137 = icmp ugt i32 %sub.ptr.div.i, 3
>>> +  %.sroa.speculated = select i1 %cmp.i1137, i32 3, i32 %sub.ptr.div.i
>>> +  %cmp6483126 = icmp eq i32 %.sroa.speculated, 0
>>> +  br i1 %cmp6483126, label %XZ.exit, label %for.body650.lr.ph
>>> +
>>> +for.body650.lr.ph:
>>> +  br label %for.body650
>>> +
>>> +loopexit:
>>> +  %inc.i.i.lcssa = phi i32 [ %inc.i.i, %for.body650 ]
>>> +  br label %XZ.exit
>>> +
>>> +XZ.exit:
>>> +  %DB.sroa.9.0.lcssa = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc.i.i.lcssa, %loopexit ]
>>> +  br label %end
>>> +
>>> +for.body650:
>>> +  %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body650.lr.ph ], [ %inc655, %for.body650 ]
>>> +  %iv2 = phi i32 [ 1, %for.body650.lr.ph ], [ %inc.i.i, %for.body650 ]
>>> +  %arrayidx.i.i1105 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %ref.i1174, i32 %iv2
>>> +  store i8 7, i8* %arrayidx.i.i1105, align 1
>>> +  %inc.i.i = add i32 %iv2, 1
>>> +  %inc655 = add i32 %iv, 1
>>> +  %cmp648 = icmp eq i32 %inc655, %.sroa.speculated
>>> +  br i1 %cmp648, label %loopexit, label %for.body650
>>> +
>>> +end:
>>> +  ret void
>>> +}
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> 



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list