[compiler-rt] r280055 - [asan] Mark failing test as UNSUPPORTED.
Vitaly Buka via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 1 15:00:17 PDT 2016
That was just curiosity. Thanks for explanation.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:54 PM Akira Hatanaka <ahatanaka at apple.com> wrote:
> This test was unexpectedly passing on some bots (I don’t remember if it
> was i386 or x86_64). I had to fix the bot, and since the comment says it is
> disabling the test, I thought I can just mark it as UNSUPPORTED. I haven’t
> tried, but if you want to use XFAIL, perhaps you can mark it as i386-darwin
> or x86_64-darwin.
> On Sep 1, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
> why is UNSUPPORTED is better than XFAIL?
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:18 PM Akira Hatanaka via llvm-commits <
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Author: ahatanak
>> Date: Mon Aug 29 22:10:19 2016
>> New Revision: 280055
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280055&view=rev
>> [asan] Mark failing test as UNSUPPORTED.
>> Modified: compiler-rt/trunk/test/asan/TestCases/use-after-scope-types.cc
>> --- compiler-rt/trunk/test/asan/TestCases/use-after-scope-types.cc
>> +++ compiler-rt/trunk/test/asan/TestCases/use-after-scope-types.cc Mon
>> Aug 29 22:10:19 2016
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>> // RUN: not %run %t 10 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
>> // Temporarily disable to fix the bot.
>> -// XFAIL: darwin
>> +// UNSUPPORTED: darwin
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string>
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits