[llvm] r278161 - Fix the runtime error caused by "Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion".

Steven Wu via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 29 11:11:12 PDT 2016


Hi Wei

I found a fallout from this commit. Here is a reduced testcase:

$ cat bugpoint-reduced-simplified.ll
target datalayout = "e-m:o-p:32:32-f64:32:64-f80:128-n8:16:32-S128"
target triple = "i386-apple-macosx10.12.0"

; Function Attrs: nounwind optsize ssp
define void @Foo() {
entry:
  switch i2 undef, label %sw.epilog102 [
    i2 -2, label %sw.bb28
  ]

sw.bb28:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %0 = load i8*, i8** undef, align 2
  %add.ptr1.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* undef, i32 -1
  %add.ptr4.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %0, i32 -1
  %cmp.i = icmp ult i8* undef, %0
  %add.ptr4.add.ptr1.i = select i1 %cmp.i, i8* %add.ptr4.i, i8* %add.ptr1.i
  br label %while.cond.i

while.cond.i:                                     ; preds = %while.cond.i, %sw.bb28
  %currPtr.1.i = phi i8* [ %incdec.ptr.i, %while.cond.i ], [ %add.ptr4.add.ptr1.i, %sw.bb28 ]
  %incdec.ptr.i = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %currPtr.1.i, i32 1
  %1 = load i8, i8* %incdec.ptr.i, align 1
  br label %while.cond.i

sw.epilog102:                                     ; preds = %entry
  unreachable
}

$ bugpoint-reduced-simplified.ll -loop-reduce -disable-output
Assertion failed: (S1->getType() == S2->getType() && "Cannot create binary operator with two operands of differing type!"), function Create, file /Users/steven/dev/trunk/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp, line 2137.

It seems SCEV trying to fold i8* %add.ptr4.i into *i8 subtract i32 1 which causes the assertion. Can you take a look?

Thanks

Steven

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Author: wmi
> Date: Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
> New Revision: 278161
> 
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278161&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix the runtime error caused by "Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion".
> 
> The patch is to fix the bug in PR28705. It was caused by setting wrong return
> value for SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion. The return values of findExistingExpansion
> have different meanings when the function is used in different ways so it is easy to make
> mistake. The fix creates two new interfaces to replace SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion,
> and specifies where each interface is expected to be used.
> 
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22942
> 
> Added:
>    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll
> Modified:
>    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h
>    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
>    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
> 
> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_SCALAREVOLUTIONEXPANDER_H
> #define LLVM_ANALYSIS_SCALAREVOLUTIONEXPANDER_H
> 
> +#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
> #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
> #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionNormalization.h"
> #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetFolder.h"
> @@ -268,7 +269,15 @@ namespace llvm {
> 
>     void setChainedPhi(PHINode *PN) { ChainedPhis.insert(PN); }
> 
> -    /// \brief Try to find LLVM IR value for S available at the point At.
> +    /// Try to find existing LLVM IR value for S available at the point At.
> +    Value *getExactExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At,
> +                                     Loop *L);
> +
> +    /// Try to find the ValueOffsetPair for S. The function is mainly
> +    /// used to check whether S can be expanded cheaply.
> +    /// If this returns a non-None value, we know we can codegen the
> +    /// `ValueOffsetPair` into a suitable expansion identical with S
> +    /// so that S can be expanded cheaply.
>     ///
>     /// L is a hint which tells in which loop to look for the suitable value.
>     /// On success return value which is equivalent to the expanded S at point
> @@ -276,7 +285,9 @@ namespace llvm {
>     ///
>     /// Note that this function does not perform an exhaustive search. I.e if it
>     /// didn't find any value it does not mean that there is no such value.
> -    Value *findExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At, Loop *L);
> +    ///
> +    Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair>
> +    getRelatedExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At, Loop *L);
> 
>   private:
>     LLVMContext &getContext() const { return SE.getContext(); }
> 
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
> @@ -1892,8 +1892,18 @@ unsigned SCEVExpander::replaceCongruentI
>   return NumElim;
> }
> 
> -Value *SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S,
> -                                           const Instruction *At, Loop *L) {
> +Value *SCEVExpander::getExactExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S,
> +                                               const Instruction *At, Loop *L) {
> +  Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair> VO =
> +      getRelatedExistingExpansion(S, At, L);
> +  if (VO && VO.getValue().second == nullptr)
> +    return VO.getValue().first;
> +  return nullptr;
> +}
> +
> +Optional<ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair>
> +SCEVExpander::getRelatedExistingExpansion(const SCEV *S, const Instruction *At,
> +                                          Loop *L) {
>   using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
> 
>   SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitingBlocks;
> @@ -1911,22 +1921,23 @@ Value *SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansi
>       continue;
> 
>     if (SE.getSCEV(LHS) == S && SE.DT.dominates(LHS, At))
> -      return LHS;
> +      return ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair(LHS, nullptr);
> 
>     if (SE.getSCEV(RHS) == S && SE.DT.dominates(RHS, At))
> -      return RHS;
> +      return ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair(RHS, nullptr);
>   }
> 
>   // Use expand's logic which is used for reusing a previous Value in
>   // ExprValueMap.
> -  if (Value *Val = FindValueInExprValueMap(S, At).first)
> -    return Val;
> +  ScalarEvolution::ValueOffsetPair VO = FindValueInExprValueMap(S, At);
> +  if (VO.first)
> +    return VO;
> 
>   // There is potential to make this significantly smarter, but this simple
>   // heuristic already gets some interesting cases.
> 
>   // Can not find suitable value.
> -  return nullptr;
> +  return None;
> }
> 
> bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper(
> @@ -1935,7 +1946,7 @@ bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHe
> 
>   // If we can find an existing value for this scev avaliable at the point "At"
>   // then consider the expression cheap.
> -  if (At && findExistingExpansion(S, At, L) != nullptr)
> +  if (At && getRelatedExistingExpansion(S, At, L))
>     return false;
> 
>   // Zero/One operand expressions
> @@ -1983,7 +1994,7 @@ bool SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHe
>     // involving division. This is just a simple search heuristic.
>     if (!At)
>       At = &ExitingBB->back();
> -    if (!findExistingExpansion(
> +    if (!getRelatedExistingExpansion(
>             SE.getAddExpr(S, SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 1)), At, L))
>       return true;
>   }
> 
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp?rev=278161&r1=278160&r2=278161&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ Value *IndVarSimplify::expandSCEVIfNeede
>                                           Type *ResultTy) {
>   // Before expanding S into an expensive LLVM expression, see if we can use an
>   // already existing value as the expansion for S.
> -  if (Value *ExistingValue = Rewriter.findExistingExpansion(S, InsertPt, L))
> +  if (Value *ExistingValue = Rewriter.getExactExistingExpansion(S, InsertPt, L))
>     if (ExistingValue->getType() == ResultTy)
>       return ExistingValue;
> 
> 
> Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll?rev=278161&view=auto
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll (added)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr28705.ll Tue Aug  9 15:40:03 2016
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +; PR28705
> +; RUN: opt < %s -indvars -S | FileCheck %s
> +
> +; Check IndVarSimplify replaces the exitval use of the induction var "%inc.i.i"
> +; with "%.sroa.speculated + 1".
> +;
> +; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
> +; CHECK: %[[EXIT:.+]] = sub i32 %.sroa.speculated, -1
> +; CHECK: %DB.sroa.9.0.lcssa = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %[[EXIT]], %loopexit ]
> +;
> +define void @foo(i32 %sub.ptr.div.i, i8* %ref.i1174) local_unnamed_addr {
> +entry:
> +  %cmp.i1137 = icmp ugt i32 %sub.ptr.div.i, 3
> +  %.sroa.speculated = select i1 %cmp.i1137, i32 3, i32 %sub.ptr.div.i
> +  %cmp6483126 = icmp eq i32 %.sroa.speculated, 0
> +  br i1 %cmp6483126, label %XZ.exit, label %for.body650.lr.ph
> +
> +for.body650.lr.ph:
> +  br label %for.body650
> +
> +loopexit:
> +  %inc.i.i.lcssa = phi i32 [ %inc.i.i, %for.body650 ]
> +  br label %XZ.exit
> +
> +XZ.exit:
> +  %DB.sroa.9.0.lcssa = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc.i.i.lcssa, %loopexit ]
> +  br label %end
> +
> +for.body650:
> +  %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body650.lr.ph ], [ %inc655, %for.body650 ]
> +  %iv2 = phi i32 [ 1, %for.body650.lr.ph ], [ %inc.i.i, %for.body650 ]
> +  %arrayidx.i.i1105 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %ref.i1174, i32 %iv2
> +  store i8 7, i8* %arrayidx.i.i1105, align 1
> +  %inc.i.i = add i32 %iv2, 1
> +  %inc655 = add i32 %iv, 1
> +  %cmp648 = icmp eq i32 %inc655, %.sroa.speculated
> +  br i1 %cmp648, label %loopexit, label %for.body650
> +
> +end:
> +  ret void
> +}
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list