[PATCH] D23940: Delete dead code
Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 29 06:29:56 PDT 2016
>> Yes, that is the kind of thing that could be handled uniformly by
>> having the IR explicitly say what can be assumed to be dso local, but
>> we don't have that feature yet.
> Right, my idea was to do something like adding “visibility hidden” on *declarations* when we have this passed-in by the linker, and update shouldAssumeDSOLocal to look for this.
Yes, having something like it is probably a good thing. I was working
on it before:
The point of this review is that the code right now is dead as we
don't have where to plug it in llvm.
More information about the llvm-commits