[llvm] r279670 - IfConversion: Rescan diamonds.

Kyle Butt via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 26 11:11:35 PDT 2016


I have a fix, I'll mail it out shortly.

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Kyle Butt <iteratee at google.com> wrote:

> Working on it. If I can't fix it in a few hours, I'll revert it.
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <
> kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kyle,
>> This commit seems to cause a crash on Hexagon:
>>
>> --- if-crash.ll ---
>> target triple = "hexagon"
>>
>> %struct.0 = type { i16, i16 }
>>
>> @t = external local_unnamed_addr global %struct.0, align 2
>>
>> define void @foo(i32 %p) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
>> entry:
>>   %conv90 = trunc i32 %p to i16
>>   %call105 = call signext i16 @bar(i16 signext 16384, i16 signext undef)
>> #0
>>   %call175 = call signext i16 @bar(i16 signext %conv90, i16 signext 4) #0
>>   %call197 = call signext i16 @bar(i16 signext %conv90, i16 signext 4) #0
>>   %cmp199 = icmp eq i16 %call197, 0
>>   br i1 %cmp199, label %if.then200, label %if.else201
>>
>> if.then200:                                       ; preds = %entry
>>   store i16 4, i16* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.0, %struct.0* @t, i32
>> 0, i32 0), align 2
>>   store i16 0, i16* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.0, %struct.0* @t, i32
>> 0, i32 1), align 2
>>   br label %if.end202
>>
>> if.else201:                                       ; preds = %entry
>>   store i16 3, i16* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.0, %struct.0* @t, i32
>> 0, i32 0), align 2
>>   br label %if.end202
>>
>> if.end202:                                        ; preds = %if.else201,
>> %if.then200
>>   ret void
>> }
>>
>> declare signext i16 @bar(i16 signext, i16 signext) local_unnamed_addr #0
>>
>> attributes #0 = { optsize "target-cpu"="hexagonv55" }
>> -------------------
>>
>>
>> $ llc -march=hexagon < if-crash.ll
>>
>>
>> llc: lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonInstrInfo.cpp:1374: virtual bool
>> llvm::HexagonInstrInfo::PredicateInstruction(llvm::MachineInstr &,
>> ArrayRef<llvm::MachineOperand>) const: Assertion `isPredicable(MI) &&
>> "Expected predicable instruction"' failed.
>>
>>
>> -Krzysztof
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/24/2016 4:34 PM, Kyle Butt via llvm-commits wrote:
>>
>>> Author: iteratee
>>> Date: Wed Aug 24 16:34:24 2016
>>> New Revision: 279670
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=279670&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> IfConversion: Rescan diamonds.
>>>
>>> The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not
>>> shared
>>> between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering
>>> instruction
>>> occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may
>>> still
>>> be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two
>>> facts by
>>> rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate
>>> both the
>>> predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.
>>>
>>> Fixed 2 bugs before recommitting. Branch instructions must be compared
>>> and found
>>> identical before diamond conversion. Also, predicate-clobbering
>>> instructions in
>>> the shared prefix disqualifies a potential diamond conversion. Includes
>>> tests
>>> for both.
>>>
>>> Added:
>>>     llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ifcvt-rescan-bug-2016-08-22.ll
>>> Modified:
>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
>>>     llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/indirectbr-3.ll
>>>
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/I
>>> fConversion.cpp?rev=279670&r1=279669&r2=279670&view=diff
>>> ============================================================
>>> ==================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp Wed Aug 24 16:34:24 2016
>>> @@ -149,11 +149,15 @@ namespace {
>>>      struct IfcvtToken {
>>>        BBInfo &BBI;
>>>        IfcvtKind Kind;
>>> -      bool NeedSubsumption;
>>>        unsigned NumDups;
>>>        unsigned NumDups2;
>>> -      IfcvtToken(BBInfo &b, IfcvtKind k, bool s, unsigned d, unsigned
>>> d2 = 0)
>>> -        : BBI(b), Kind(k), NeedSubsumption(s), NumDups(d), NumDups2(d2)
>>> {}
>>> +      bool NeedSubsumption : 1;
>>> +      bool TClobbersPred : 1;
>>> +      bool FClobbersPred : 1;
>>> +      IfcvtToken(BBInfo &b, IfcvtKind k, bool s, unsigned d, unsigned
>>> d2 = 0,
>>> +                 bool tc = false, bool fc = false)
>>> +        : BBI(b), Kind(k), NumDups(d), NumDups2(d2), NeedSubsumption(s),
>>> +          TClobbersPred(tc), FClobbersPred(fc) {}
>>>      };
>>>
>>>      /// Results of if-conversion feasibility analysis indexed by basic
>>> block
>>> @@ -202,16 +206,29 @@ namespace {
>>>      bool ValidTriangle(BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI,
>>>                         bool FalseBranch, unsigned &Dups,
>>>                         BranchProbability Prediction) const;
>>> +    bool CountDuplicatedInstructions(
>>> +        MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator
>>> &FIB,
>>> +        MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIE, MachineBasicBlock::iterator
>>> &FIE,
>>> +        unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2,
>>> +        MachineBasicBlock &TBB, MachineBasicBlock &FBB,
>>> +        bool SkipUnconditionalBranches) const;
>>>      bool ValidDiamond(BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI,
>>> -                      unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2) const;
>>> +                      unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2,
>>> +                      BBInfo &TrueBBICalc, BBInfo &FalseBBICalc) const;
>>>      void AnalyzeBranches(BBInfo &BBI);
>>>      void ScanInstructions(BBInfo &BBI,
>>>                            MachineBasicBlock::iterator &Begin,
>>> -                          MachineBasicBlock::iterator &End) const;
>>> +                          MachineBasicBlock::iterator &End,
>>> +                          bool BranchUnpredicable = false) const;
>>> +    bool RescanInstructions(
>>> +        MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator
>>> &FIB,
>>> +        MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIE, MachineBasicBlock::iterator
>>> &FIE,
>>> +        BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI) const;
>>>      void AnalyzeBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
>>>                        std::vector<std::unique_ptr<IfcvtToken>>
>>> &Tokens);
>>>      bool FeasibilityAnalysis(BBInfo &BBI, SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand>
>>> &Cond,
>>> -                             bool isTriangle = false, bool RevBranch =
>>> false);
>>> +                             bool isTriangle = false, bool RevBranch =
>>> false,
>>> +                             bool hasCommonTail = false);
>>>      void AnalyzeBlocks(MachineFunction &MF,
>>>                         std::vector<std::unique_ptr<IfcvtToken>>
>>> &Tokens);
>>>      void InvalidatePreds(MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
>>> @@ -219,7 +236,8 @@ namespace {
>>>      bool IfConvertSimple(BBInfo &BBI, IfcvtKind Kind);
>>>      bool IfConvertTriangle(BBInfo &BBI, IfcvtKind Kind);
>>>      bool IfConvertDiamond(BBInfo &BBI, IfcvtKind Kind,
>>> -                          unsigned NumDups1, unsigned NumDups2);
>>> +                          unsigned NumDups1, unsigned NumDups2,
>>> +                          bool TClobbers, bool FClobbers);
>>>      void PredicateBlock(BBInfo &BBI,
>>>                          MachineBasicBlock::iterator E,
>>>                          SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond,
>>> @@ -406,7 +424,9 @@ bool IfConverter::runOnMachineFunction(M
>>>          DEBUG(dbgs() << "Ifcvt (Diamond): BB#" << BBI.BB->getNumber()
>>> << " (T:"
>>>                       << BBI.TrueBB->getNumber() << ",F:"
>>>                       << BBI.FalseBB->getNumber() << ") ");
>>> -        RetVal = IfConvertDiamond(BBI, Kind, NumDups, NumDups2);
>>> +        RetVal = IfConvertDiamond(BBI, Kind, NumDups, NumDups2,
>>> +                                  Token->TClobbersPred,
>>> +                                  Token->FClobbersPred);
>>>          DEBUG(dbgs() << (RetVal ? "succeeded!" : "failed!") << "\n");
>>>          if (RetVal) ++NumDiamonds;
>>>          break;
>>> @@ -591,14 +611,22 @@ static inline bool skipDebugInstructions
>>>  /// finally point to the first shared instruction in the tail.
>>>  /// Upon return [TIB, TIE), and [FIB, FIE) mark the un-duplicated
>>> portions of
>>>  /// two blocks.
>>> -static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>> +/// @param Dups1 count of duplicated instructions at the beginning of
>>> the 2
>>> +/// blocks.
>>> +/// @param Dups2 count of duplicated instructions at the end of the 2
>>> blocks.
>>> +/// @param SkipUnconditionalBranches if true, Don't make sure that
>>> +/// unconditional branches at the end of the blocks are the same. True
>>> is
>>> +/// passed when the blocks are analyzable to allow for fallthrough to be
>>> +/// handled.
>>> +/// @return false if the shared portion prevents if conversion.
>>> +bool IfConverter::CountDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>      MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIB,
>>>      MachineBasicBlock::iterator &FIB,
>>>      MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIE,
>>>      MachineBasicBlock::iterator &FIE,
>>>      unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2,
>>>      MachineBasicBlock &TBB, MachineBasicBlock &FBB,
>>> -    bool SkipConditionalBranches) {
>>> +    bool SkipUnconditionalBranches) const {
>>>
>>>    while (TIB != TIE && FIB != FIE) {
>>>      // Skip dbg_value instructions. These do not count.
>>> @@ -608,6 +636,11 @@ static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>        break;
>>>      if (!TIB->isIdenticalTo(*FIB))
>>>        break;
>>> +    // A pred-clobbering instruction in the shared portion prevents
>>> +    // if-conversion.
>>> +    std::vector<MachineOperand> PredDefs;
>>> +    if (TII->DefinesPredicate(*TIB, PredDefs))
>>> +      return false;
>>>      ++Dups1;
>>>      ++TIB;
>>>      ++FIB;
>>> @@ -618,7 +651,7 @@ static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>    // can be left unpredicated.
>>>    // Check for already containing all of the block.
>>>    if (TIB == TIE || FIB == FIE)
>>> -    return;
>>> +    return true;
>>>    // Now, in preparation for counting duplicate instructions at the
>>> ends of the
>>>    // blocks, move the end iterators up past any branch instructions.
>>>    --TIE;
>>> @@ -641,12 +674,7 @@ static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>    });
>>>
>>>    if (!TBB.succ_empty() || !FBB.succ_empty()) {
>>> -    if (SkipConditionalBranches) {
>>> -      while (!TEmpty && TIE->isBranch())
>>> -        shrinkInclusiveRange(TIB, TIE, TEmpty);
>>> -      while (!FEmpty && FIE->isBranch())
>>> -        shrinkInclusiveRange(FIB, FIE, FEmpty);
>>> -    } else {
>>> +    if (SkipUnconditionalBranches) {
>>>        while (!TEmpty && TIE->isUnconditionalBranch())
>>>          shrinkInclusiveRange(TIB, TIE, TEmpty);
>>>        while (!FEmpty && FIE->isUnconditionalBranch())
>>> @@ -657,7 +685,7 @@ static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>    // If Dups1 includes all of a block, then don't count duplicate
>>>    // instructions at the end of the blocks.
>>>    if (TEmpty || FEmpty)
>>> -    return;
>>> +    return true;
>>>
>>>    // Count duplicate instructions at the ends of the blocks.
>>>    while (!TEmpty && !FEmpty) {
>>> @@ -668,19 +696,48 @@ static void countDuplicatedInstructions(
>>>        break;
>>>      if (!TIE->isIdenticalTo(*FIE))
>>>        break;
>>> -    // If we are trying to make sure the conditional branches are the
>>> same, we
>>> -    // still don't want to count them.
>>> -    if (SkipConditionalBranches || !TIE->isBranch())
>>> +    // We have to verify that any branch instructions are the same, and
>>> then we
>>> +    // don't count them toward the # of duplicate instructions.
>>> +    if (!TIE->isBranch())
>>>        ++Dups2;
>>>      shrinkInclusiveRange(TIB, TIE, TEmpty);
>>>      shrinkInclusiveRange(FIB, FIE, FEmpty);
>>>    }
>>> +  return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/// RescanInstructions - Run ScanInstructions on a pair of blocks.
>>> +/// @param TIB - True Iterator Begin, points to first non-shared
>>> instruction
>>> +/// @param FIB - False Iterator Begin, points to first non-shared
>>> instruction
>>> +/// @param TIE - True Iterator End, points past last non-shared
>>> instruction
>>> +/// @param FIE - False Iterator End, points past last non-shared
>>> instruction
>>> +/// @param TrueBBI  - BBInfo to update for the true block.
>>> +/// @param FalseBBI - BBInfo to update for the false block.
>>> +/// @returns - false if either block cannot be predicated or if both
>>> blocks end
>>> +///   with a predicate-clobbering instruction.
>>> +bool IfConverter::RescanInstructions(
>>> +    MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &FIB,
>>> +    MachineBasicBlock::iterator &TIE, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &FIE,
>>> +    BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI) const {
>>> +  bool BranchUnpredicable = true;
>>> +  TrueBBI.IsUnpredicable = FalseBBI.IsUnpredicable = false;
>>> +  ScanInstructions(TrueBBI, TIB, TIE, BranchUnpredicable);
>>> +  if (TrueBBI.IsUnpredicable)
>>> +    return false;
>>> +  ScanInstructions(FalseBBI, FIB, FIE, BranchUnpredicable);
>>> +  if (FalseBBI.IsUnpredicable)
>>> +    return false;
>>> +  if (TrueBBI.ClobbersPred && FalseBBI.ClobbersPred)
>>> +    return false;
>>> +  return true;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /// ValidDiamond - Returns true if the 'true' and 'false' blocks (along
>>>  /// with their common predecessor) forms a valid diamond shape for
>>> ifcvt.
>>> -bool IfConverter::ValidDiamond(BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI,
>>> -                               unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2) const {
>>> +bool IfConverter::ValidDiamond(
>>> +    BBInfo &TrueBBI, BBInfo &FalseBBI,
>>> +    unsigned &Dups1, unsigned &Dups2,
>>> +    BBInfo &TrueBBICalc, BBInfo &FalseBBICalc) const {
>>>    Dups1 = Dups2 = 0;
>>>    if (TrueBBI.IsBeingAnalyzed || TrueBBI.IsDone ||
>>>        FalseBBI.IsBeingAnalyzed || FalseBBI.IsDone)
>>> @@ -701,19 +758,33 @@ bool IfConverter::ValidDiamond(BBInfo &T
>>>      return false;
>>>
>>>    // FIXME: Allow true block to have an early exit?
>>> -  if (TrueBBI.FalseBB || FalseBBI.FalseBB ||
>>> -      (TrueBBI.ClobbersPred && FalseBBI.ClobbersPred))
>>> +  if (TrueBBI.FalseBB || FalseBBI.FalseBB)
>>>      return false;
>>>
>>>    // Count duplicate instructions at the beginning and end of the true
>>> and
>>>    // false blocks.
>>> +  // Skip unconditional branches only if we are considering an
>>> analyzable
>>> +  // diamond. Otherwise the branches must be the same.
>>> +  bool SkipUnconditionalBranches =
>>> +      TrueBBI.IsBrAnalyzable && FalseBBI.IsBrAnalyzable;
>>>    MachineBasicBlock::iterator TIB = TrueBBI.BB->begin();
>>>    MachineBasicBlock::iterator FIB = FalseBBI.BB->begin();
>>>    MachineBasicBlock::iterator TIE = TrueBBI.BB->end();
>>>    MachineBasicBlock::iterator FIE = FalseBBI.BB->end();
>>> -  countDuplicatedInstructions(TIB, FIB, TIE, FIE, Dups1, Dups2,
>>> -                              *TrueBBI.BB, *FalseBBI.BB,
>>> -                              /* SkipConditionalBranches */ true);
>>> +  if(!CountDuplicatedInstructions(TIB, FIB, TIE, FIE, Dups1, Dups2,
>>> +                                  *TrueBBI.BB, *FalseBBI.BB,
>>> +                                  SkipUnconditionalBranches))
>>> +    return false;
>>> +
>>> +  TrueBBICalc.BB = TrueBBI.BB;
>>> +  FalseBBICalc.BB = FalseBBI.BB;
>>> +  if (!RescanInstructions(TIB, FIB, TIE, FIE, TrueBBICalc,
>>> FalseBBICalc))
>>> +    return false;
>>> +  // The size is used to decide whether to if-convert, and the shared
>>> portions
>>> +  // are subtracted off. Because of the subtraction, we just use the
>>> size that
>>> +  // was calculated by the original ScanInstructions, as it is correct.
>>> +  TrueBBICalc.NonPredSize = TrueBBI.NonPredSize;
>>> +  FalseBBICalc.NonPredSize = FalseBBI.NonPredSize;
>>>    return true;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> @@ -748,7 +819,8 @@ void IfConverter::AnalyzeBranches(BBInfo
>>>  /// If so, the block is not predicable unless it's the last instruction.
>>>  void IfConverter::ScanInstructions(BBInfo &BBI,
>>>                                     MachineBasicBlock::iterator &Begin,
>>> -                                   MachineBasicBlock::iterator &End)
>>> const {
>>> +                                   MachineBasicBlock::iterator &End,
>>> +                                   bool BranchUnpredicable) const {
>>>    if (BBI.IsDone || BBI.IsUnpredicable)
>>>      return;
>>>
>>> @@ -798,6 +870,11 @@ void IfConverter::ScanInstructions(BBInf
>>>      bool isPredicated = TII->isPredicated(MI);
>>>      bool isCondBr = BBI.IsBrAnalyzable && MI.isConditionalBranch();
>>>
>>> +    if (BranchUnpredicable && MI.isBranch()) {
>>> +      BBI.IsUnpredicable = true;
>>> +      return;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      // A conditional branch is not predicable, but it may be eliminated.
>>>      if (isCondBr)
>>>        continue;
>>> @@ -841,11 +918,22 @@ void IfConverter::ScanInstructions(BBInf
>>>
>>>  /// Determine if the block is a suitable candidate to be predicated by
>>> the
>>>  /// specified predicate.
>>> +/// @param BBI BBInfo for the block to check
>>> +/// @param Pred Predicate array for the branch that leads to BBI
>>> +/// @param isTriangle true if the Analysis is for a triangle
>>> +/// @param RevBranch true if Reverse(Pred) leads to BBI (e.g. BBI is
>>> the false
>>> +///        case
>>> +/// @param hasCommonTail true if BBI shares a tail with a sibling block
>>> that
>>> +///        contains any instruction that would make the block
>>> unpredicable.
>>>  bool IfConverter::FeasibilityAnalysis(BBInfo &BBI,
>>>                                        SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand>
>>> &Pred,
>>> -                                      bool isTriangle, bool RevBranch) {
>>> +                                      bool isTriangle, bool RevBranch,
>>> +                                      bool hasCommonTail) {
>>>    // If the block is dead or unpredicable, then it cannot be predicated.
>>> -  if (BBI.IsDone || BBI.IsUnpredicable)
>>> +  // Two blocks may share a common unpredicable tail, but this doesn't
>>> prevent
>>> +  // them from being if-converted. The non-shared portion is assumed to
>>> have
>>> +  // been checked
>>> +  if (BBI.IsDone || (BBI.IsUnpredicable && !hasCommonTail))
>>>      return false;
>>>
>>>    // If it is already predicated but we couldn't analyze its
>>> terminator, the
>>> @@ -859,7 +947,7 @@ bool IfConverter::FeasibilityAnalysis(BB
>>>    if (BBI.Predicate.size() && !TII->SubsumesPredicate(Pred,
>>> BBI.Predicate))
>>>      return false;
>>>
>>> -  if (BBI.BrCond.size()) {
>>> +  if (!hasCommonTail && BBI.BrCond.size()) {
>>>      if (!isTriangle)
>>>        return false;
>>>
>>> @@ -966,25 +1054,37 @@ void IfConverter::AnalyzeBlock(
>>>
>>>      BranchProbability Prediction = MBPI->getEdgeProbability(BB,
>>> TrueBBI.BB);
>>>
>>> -    if (CanRevCond && ValidDiamond(TrueBBI, FalseBBI, Dups, Dups2) &&
>>> +    if (CanRevCond) {
>>> +      BBInfo TrueBBICalc, FalseBBICalc;
>>> +      if (ValidDiamond(TrueBBI, FalseBBI, Dups, Dups2,
>>> +                       TrueBBICalc, FalseBBICalc) &&
>>>          MeetIfcvtSizeLimit(*TrueBBI.BB, (TrueBBI.NonPredSize - (Dups +
>>> Dups2) +
>>> -                                         TrueBBI.ExtraCost),
>>> TrueBBI.ExtraCost2,
>>> +                                         TrueBBICalc.ExtraCost),
>>> +                           TrueBBICalc.ExtraCost2,
>>>                             *FalseBBI.BB, (FalseBBI.NonPredSize - (Dups
>>> + Dups2) +
>>> -                                        FalseBBI.ExtraCost),FalseBBI.E
>>> xtraCost2,
>>> -                         Prediction) &&
>>> -        FeasibilityAnalysis(TrueBBI, BBI.BrCond) &&
>>> -        FeasibilityAnalysis(FalseBBI, RevCond)) {
>>> -      // Diamond:
>>> -      //   EBB
>>> -      //   / \_
>>> -      //  |   |
>>> -      // TBB FBB
>>> -      //   \ /
>>> -      //  TailBB
>>> -      // Note TailBB can be empty.
>>> -      Tokens.push_back(llvm::make_unique<IfcvtToken>(
>>> -          BBI, ICDiamond, TNeedSub | FNeedSub, Dups, Dups2));
>>> -      Enqueued = true;
>>> +                                          FalseBBICalc.ExtraCost),
>>> +                           FalseBBICalc.ExtraCost2,
>>> +                           Prediction) &&
>>> +        FeasibilityAnalysis(TrueBBI, BBI.BrCond,
>>> +                            /* IsTriangle */ false, /* RevCond */ false,
>>> +                            /* hasCommonTail */ true) &&
>>> +        FeasibilityAnalysis(FalseBBI, RevCond,
>>> +                            /* IsTriangle */ false, /* RevCond */ false,
>>> +                            /* hasCommonTail */ true)) {
>>> +        // Diamond:
>>> +        //   EBB
>>> +        //   / \_
>>> +        //  |   |
>>> +        // TBB FBB
>>> +        //   \ /
>>> +        //  TailBB
>>> +        // Note TailBB can be empty.
>>> +        Tokens.push_back(llvm::make_unique<IfcvtToken>(
>>> +                BBI, ICDiamond, TNeedSub | FNeedSub, Dups, Dups2,
>>> +                (bool) TrueBBICalc.ClobbersPred,
>>> +                (bool) FalseBBICalc.ClobbersPred));
>>> +        Enqueued = true;
>>> +      }
>>>      }
>>>
>>>      if (ValidTriangle(TrueBBI, FalseBBI, false, Dups, Prediction) &&
>>> @@ -1429,8 +1529,18 @@ bool IfConverter::IfConvertTriangle(BBIn
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /// If convert a diamond sub-CFG.
>>> +/// \p BBI is the head of the diamond
>>> +/// \p NumDups1 - number of shared instructions at the beginning of
>>> TrueBBI and
>>> +///               FalseBBI
>>> +/// \p NumDups2 - number of shared instructions at the end of TrueBBI
>>> and
>>> +///               FalseBBI
>>> +/// \p TClobbersPred - True if the true block clobbers the predicate in
>>> the
>>> +///                    non-shared portion.
>>> +/// \p TClobbersPred - True if the false block clobbers the predicate
>>> in the
>>> +///                    non-shared portion.
>>>  bool IfConverter::IfConvertDiamond(BBInfo &BBI, IfcvtKind Kind,
>>> -                                   unsigned NumDups1, unsigned
>>> NumDups2) {
>>> +                                   unsigned NumDups1, unsigned NumDups2,
>>> +                                   bool TClobbersPred, bool
>>> FClobbersPred) {
>>>    BBInfo &TrueBBI  = BBAnalysis[BBI.TrueBB->getNumber()];
>>>    BBInfo &FalseBBI = BBAnalysis[BBI.FalseBB->getNumber()];
>>>    MachineBasicBlock *TailBB = TrueBBI.TrueBB;
>>> @@ -1468,9 +1578,9 @@ bool IfConverter::IfConvertDiamond(BBInf
>>>
>>>    // Figure out the more profitable ordering.
>>>    bool DoSwap = false;
>>> -  if (TrueBBI.ClobbersPred && !FalseBBI.ClobbersPred)
>>> +  if (TClobbersPred && !FClobbersPred)
>>>      DoSwap = true;
>>> -  else if (TrueBBI.ClobbersPred == FalseBBI.ClobbersPred) {
>>> +  else if (TClobbersPred == FClobbersPred) {
>>>      if (TrueBBI.NonPredSize > FalseBBI.NonPredSize)
>>>        DoSwap = true;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/indirectbr-3.ll
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/
>>> ARM/indirectbr-3.ll?rev=279670&r1=279669&r2=279670&view=diff
>>> ============================================================
>>> ==================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/indirectbr-3.ll (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/indirectbr-3.ll Wed Aug 24 16:34:24 2016
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> -; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7-apple-ios -arm-atomic-cfg-tidy=0 |
>>> FileCheck %s
>>> +; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7-apple-ios -arm-atomic-cfg-tidy=0
>>> -stats 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
>>>
>>>  ; If ARMBaseInstrInfo::AnalyzeBlocks returns the wrong value, which
>>> was possible
>>>  ; for blocks with indirect branches, the IfConverter could end up
>>> deleting
>>> @@ -9,9 +9,17 @@
>>>  define i32 @preserve_blocks(i32 %x) {
>>>  ; preserve_blocks:
>>>  ; CHECK: Block address taken
>>> -; CHECK: movs r0, #2
>>>  ; CHECK: movs r0, #1
>>> +; CHECK: Block address taken
>>> +; CHECK: movs r0, #2
>>>  ; CHECK-NOT: Address of block that was removed by CodeGen
>>> +
>>> +; Separate bug. There are no valid diamonds to if-convert in this file.
>>> +; There was a bug in the if-conversion code that would if-convert a
>>> false
>>> +; diamond where one side had a return and the other had an indirect
>>> branch.
>>> +; Make sure no diamond conversions occurred while compiling this file.
>>> +; CHECK: Statistics Collected
>>> +; CHECK-NOT: 1 ifcvt          - Number of diamond if-conversions
>>> performed
>>>  entry:
>>>    %c2 = icmp slt i32 %x, 3
>>>    %blockaddr = select i1 %c2, i8* blockaddress(@preserve_blocks,
>>> %ibt1), i8* blockaddress(@preserve_blocks, %ibt2)
>>>
>>> Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ifcvt-rescan-bug-2016-08-22.ll
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/
>>> Thumb2/ifcvt-rescan-bug-2016-08-22.ll?rev=279670&view=auto
>>> ============================================================
>>> ==================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ifcvt-rescan-bug-2016-08-22.ll
>>> (added)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ifcvt-rescan-bug-2016-08-22.ll Wed
>>> Aug 24 16:34:24 2016
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>>> +; RUN: llc -O2 -o - %s | FileCheck %s
>>> +target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
>>> +target triple = "thumbv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf"
>>> +
>>> +; Function Attrs: argmemonly nounwind
>>> +declare void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64, i8* nocapture) #0
>>> +
>>> +; Function Attrs: nounwind
>>> +declare void @_ZNSaIcEC2Ev() unnamed_addr #0 align 2
>>> +
>>> +declare void @_ZNSsC1EPKcRKSaIcE() unnamed_addr #0
>>> +
>>> +; It isn't valid to If-Convert the following function, even though the
>>> calls
>>> +; are in common. The calls clobber the predicate info.
>>> +; CHECK: cbnz r{{[0-9]+}}, .LBB0_2
>>> +; CHECK: BB#1
>>> +; CHECK: .LBB0_2
>>> +; Function Attrs: nounwind
>>> +define hidden void @_ZN4llvm14DOTGraphTraitsIPNS_
>>> 13ScheduleDAGMIEE17getEdgeAttributesEPKNS_5SUnitENS_13SUnitIteratorEPKNS_11ScheduleDAGE()
>>> #0 align 2 {
>>> +  br i1 undef, label %1, label %2
>>> +
>>> +; <label>:1:                                      ; preds = %0
>>> +  call void @_ZNSaIcEC2Ev() #0
>>> +  call void @_ZNSsC1EPKcRKSaIcE()
>>> +  br label %3
>>> +
>>> +; <label>:2:                                      ; preds = %0
>>> +  call void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64 1, i8* undef) #0
>>> +  call void @_ZNSaIcEC2Ev() #0
>>> +  br label %3
>>> +
>>> +; <label>:3:                                      ; preds = %2, %1
>>> +  ret void
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +attributes #0 = { nounwind }
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
>> by The Linux Foundation
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160826/6a9045ae/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list