[PATCH] D23183: [SimplifyLibCalls] Emit an intrinsic instead of a libcall when optimizing pow

Davide Italiano via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 4 17:20:34 PDT 2016


davide created this revision.
davide added reviewers: majnemer, spatel.
davide added a subscriber: llvm-commits.

I discovered this while working on https://reviews.llvm.org/D22104
The general direction seems to be that of emitting an intrinsic when possible. I was a little bit worried about some architectures not supporting the intrinsic but David pointed out that for targets which don't support the intrinsic the intrinsic will be transformed into a libcall into SDAG.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D23183

Files:
  lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
  test/Transforms/InstCombine/pow-1.ll

Index: test/Transforms/InstCombine/pow-1.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/InstCombine/pow-1.ll
+++ test/Transforms/InstCombine/pow-1.ll
@@ -37,15 +37,15 @@
 define float @test_simplify3(float %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_simplify3(
   %retval = call float @powf(float 2.0, float %x)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXP2F:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call float @exp2f(float %x) [[NUW_RO:#[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXP2F:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call float @llvm.exp2.f32(float %x)
   ret float %retval
 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret float [[EXP2F]]
 }
 
 define double @test_simplify4(double %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_simplify4(
   %retval = call double @pow(double 2.0, double %x)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXP2:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call double @exp2(double %x) [[NUW_RO]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXP2:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call double @llvm.exp2.f64(double %x)
   ret double %retval
 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret double [[EXP2]]
 }
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
 define float @test_simplify7(float %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_simplify7(
   %retval = call float @powf(float %x, float 0.5)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[SQRTF:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call float @sqrtf(float %x) [[NUW_RO]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SQRTF:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call float @sqrtf(float %x) [[NUW_RO:#[0-9]+]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT: [[FABSF:%[a-z0-9]+]] = call float @fabsf(float [[SQRTF]]) [[NUW_RO]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT: [[FCMP:%[a-z0-9]+]] = fcmp oeq float %x, 0xFFF0000000000000
 ; CHECK-NEXT: [[SELECT:%[a-z0-9]+]] = select i1 [[FCMP]], float 0x7FF0000000000000, float [[FABSF]]
Index: lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
@@ -993,16 +993,20 @@
     Ret = optimizeUnaryDoubleFP(CI, B, true);
 
   Value *Op1 = CI->getArgOperand(0), *Op2 = CI->getArgOperand(1);
+
+  // pow(1.0, x) -> 1.0
+  if (match(Op1, m_SpecificFP(1.0)))
+    return Op1;
+  // pow(2.0, x) -> llvm.exp2(x)
+  if (match(Op1, m_SpecificFP(2.0))) {
+    Value *Exp2 = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(CI->getModule(), Intrinsic::exp2,
+                                            CI->getType());
+    return B.CreateCall(Exp2, Op2, "exp2");
+  }
+
+  // There's no llvm.exp10 intrinsic yet, but, maybe, some day there will
+  // be one.
   if (ConstantFP *Op1C = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(Op1)) {
-    // pow(1.0, x) -> 1.0
-    if (Op1C->isExactlyValue(1.0))
-      return Op1C;
-    // pow(2.0, x) -> exp2(x)
-    if (Op1C->isExactlyValue(2.0) &&
-        hasUnaryFloatFn(TLI, Op1->getType(), LibFunc::exp2, LibFunc::exp2f,
-                        LibFunc::exp2l))
-      return emitUnaryFloatFnCall(Op2, TLI->getName(LibFunc::exp2), B,
-                                  Callee->getAttributes());
     // pow(10.0, x) -> exp10(x)
     if (Op1C->isExactlyValue(10.0) &&
         hasUnaryFloatFn(TLI, Op1->getType(), LibFunc::exp10, LibFunc::exp10f,


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D23183.66885.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160805/a7b137c4/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list