[PATCH] D22630: Loop rotation

Sebastian Pop via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 27 12:06:07 PDT 2016


sebpop added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.cpp:319
@@ +318,3 @@
+  // Collect all nodes of the loop from header to latch.
+  BasicBlock *NewH = collectSEMEBlocks(OrigH, OrigLatch, Blocks, Exits);
+  assert(NewH);
----------------
eli.friedman wrote:
> sebpop wrote:
> > hiraditya wrote:
> > > eli.friedman wrote:
> > > > Is it possible this will clone more code?  The trunk version would only clone the header; it looks like this will clone the whole loop body excluding the latch block?
> > > Yes, this will clone all the exiting basic blocks excluding the latch block (starting from the header until all it finds a BB which is not exiting). This is required to expose the redundancies that could be removed as a result of cloning the loop body. Currently there is a flag to control how much we want to clone (RotationMaxSize), I can add more specific flags to control how many exiting blocks we want to copy.
> > > In general, it would be a good idea to clone all the exiting basic blocks to expose all the redundancies.
> > > 
> > > until all it finds a BB which is not exiting
> > To rotate the loop from Michael (loop with if-then-else followed by loop exit) we could avoid stopping at the first BB which is not exiting the loop, and to continue until all loop exit edges have been duplicated.
> > 
> This is why I'd really like to see this patch split... it would be much easier to have this discussion with a patch which is specifically "Clone more blocks in loop rotation", so we could discuss what exactly makes sense independently of the changes to the cloning algorithm.
You mean let's commit this patch as is and then extend it to catch more loops?
Or do you mean we should restrict the new codegen algorithm to only catch the loops that are currently rotated?
Can you please be a bit more specific about which parts of this patch you would like to see split?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D22630





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list