Missing TargetPrefix for NVVM intrinsics

[Justin Holewinski via llvm-commits]

Seems reasonable to me. Thanks for cleaning this up!

On 7/6/2016 6:39 PM, Justin Bogner wrote:
> Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> writes:
>>> I'll wait on the ones that drop the ptx intrinsics and builtins
>>> until I hear back about the ones that don't seem to have an nvvm
>>> equivalent.
>> What's the outstanding question, exactly?  It seems to me we should
>> just rename them.
> Ah, I misunderstood before.
>
> This ended up being a bit more work on the LLVM side, but the attached
> patch replaces all of the ptx.read intrinsics with nvvm.read.ptx.sreg
> variants, cleans up the duplicate nvvm variants that leaves around, and
> renames ptx.bar.sync to nvvm.bar.sync.
>
> The clang patch just updates the names and doesn't change anything with
> this version.
>
> WDYT?
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160707/fac43e32/attachment.html>