[PATCH] D20847: BitCast infinite loop fix

Daniel Berlin via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 28 10:08:20 PDT 2016


In situations like this, where it is causing demonstrable issues and
appears broken, two "votes" are enough to revert the change.

You should ask the author to revert the change, explicitly, in a separate
thread (a lot of people filter review mail).
If they don't do so expediently, you should revert it for them, and ask
them to take a look at fixing when they get a chance.



On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac at gmail.com>
wrote:

> evstupac added a comment.
>
> Sorry if I am missing something.
> But is 2 votes here enough to revert the revisions?
> Should author do this? Or I can do this as well?
> There are still no vote from author and reviewer.
>
>
> Repository:
>   rL LLVM
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D20847
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160628/ca9b7d51/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list