Add support for musl-libc on Linux
Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 13 06:33:16 PDT 2016
On 13 June 2016 at 09:25, Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-06-13 21:02 GMT+08:00 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>:
>> Should musl really be an environment? What happens when targeting ARM,
>> do we get a gnueabi+musl? Is it used as an environment when
>> configuring gcc?
> Honestly I couldn't judge if musl *should* be an environment. But it
> *is* used as an environment when configuring gcc, and
> "x86_64-pc-linux-musl" could be parsed by config.sub as a valid
> As for ARM, I guess something like arm-linux-musleabi would do.
OK, it is slightly annoying that we will have a Foo and FooMusl
environments, but if that is what is used for configuring gnu tools I
think it is the correct thing for us to do.
So the patch LGTM. We can extend it to handle other architectures once it is in.
More information about the llvm-commits