[PATCH] D20925: FileCheck: print input on errors
Xinliang David Li via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 5 10:02:45 PDT 2016
1) the output is less verbose
2) The actionable stuff is captured in one script.
isn't it what you want?
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote:
> Why is it better? When you don't want to see the input?
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>
> > I think the better approach is to capture the input and re-run command
> > in a temporary file by default.
> > 1) create a re-run file: rerun_script
> > 2) dump the following to rerun_script:
> > cat << EOF > input_tmp
> > ..... input here
> > EOF
> > cat input_tmp | <FileCheck Command>
> > 3) in error message, show " To rerun, run rerun_script ".
> > David
> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Dmitry Vyukov via llvm-commits
> > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >> dvyukov added a comment.
> >> > FYI, see also http://reviews.llvm.org/D20105
> >> Answered there. I don't understand why printing input is not the
> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D20925
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> llvm-commits mailing list
> >> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits