[llvm] r271020 - Don't generate unnecessary signed ConstantRange during multiply. NFC
Pete Cooper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 27 10:06:50 PDT 2016
Date: Fri May 27 12:06:50 2016
New Revision: 271020
Don't generate unnecessary signed ConstantRange during multiply. NFC
r231483 taught ConstantRange::multiply to be clever about signed vs unsigned ranges. For example, an unsigned range could be full-set while the signed range is more specific than that.
In looking at the allocations trace for LTO'ing verify-uselistorder (see r236629 for details), millions of allocations are from APInt, many of which come from ConstantRange's.
This change tries to avoid some (3.2 million) allocations by returning the unsigned range if its suitable. The checks here are that it should not be a wrapping range, and should be positive. That should be enough to check for ranges such as [1, 10) which the signed range will be equal to, if we were to calculate it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20723
Reviewed by James Molloy
--- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantRange.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantRange.cpp Fri May 27 12:06:50 2016
@@ -713,6 +713,13 @@ ConstantRange::multiply(const ConstantRa
this_max * Other_max + 1);
ConstantRange UR = Result_zext.truncate(getBitWidth());
+ // If the unsigned range doesn't wrap, and isn't negative then it's a range
+ // from one positive number to another which is as good as we can generate.
+ // In this case, skip the extra work of generating signed ranges which aren't
+ // going to be better than this range.
+ if (!UR.isWrappedSet() && UR.getLower().isNonNegative())
+ return UR;
// Now the signed range. Because we could be dealing with negative numbers
// here, the lower bound is the smallest of the cartesian product of the
// lower and upper ranges; for example:
More information about the llvm-commits