3.8 Merge Request: rL266217

[Tom Stellard via llvm-commits]

Hi Nirav,

Does it make sense to merge http://reviews.llvm.org/rL266438 even
without  http://reviews.llvm.org/rL266217.

-Tom

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:03:10PM -0400, Nirav Davé wrote:
> This patch causes building clang for ppc64le to trip over a latent bug
> (PR27350) which was fixed in http://reviews.llvm.org/rL266438. Both or
> neither should be applied.
> 
> -Nirav
> 
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Owen,
> >
> > Is this OK to merge to the 3.8 branch: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL266217
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:53:10PM +0000, Kit Barton wrote:
> > >    Hi,
> > >    Could we please include rL266217 in the 3.8.1 release?
> > >    It fixes PR27138, in addition to PR26827 (which was noted in the
> > >    Phabricator review).
> > >
> > >    Thanks,
> > >
> > >    Kit Barton, Ph.D.
> > >    LLVM Development on POWER
> > >    IBM Toronto Lab, D2/929/8200/MKM
> > >    8200 Warden Ave, Markham, L6G 1C7
> > >    (905) 413-3452
> > >    kbarton at ca.ibm.com
> >