[llvm] r269949 - Re-commit r269828 "X86: Avoid using _chkstk when lowering WIN_ALLOCA instructions"

Hans Wennborg via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 18 09:10:17 PDT 2016


Author: hans
Date: Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
New Revision: 269949

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=269949&view=rev
Log:
Re-commit r269828 "X86: Avoid using _chkstk when lowering WIN_ALLOCA instructions"

with an additional fix to make RegAllocFast ignore undef physreg uses. It would
previously get confused about the "push %eax" instruction's use of eax. That
method for adjusting the stack pointer is used in X86FrameLowering::emitSPUpdate
as well, but since that runs after register-allocation, we didn't run into the
RegAllocFast issue before.

Added:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win-alloca-expander.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cleanuppad-inalloca.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/dynamic-alloca-in-entry.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-ctor.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-invoke.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-stdcall.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shrink-wrap-chkstk.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -349,6 +349,11 @@ void RAFast::usePhysReg(MachineOperand &
   unsigned PhysReg = MO.getReg();
   assert(TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(PhysReg) &&
          "Bad usePhysReg operand");
+
+  // Ignore undef uses.
+  if (MO.isUndef())
+    return;
+
   markRegUsedInInstr(PhysReg);
   switch (PhysRegState[PhysReg]) {
   case regDisabled:

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/CMakeLists.txt Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ set(sources
   X86WinEHState.cpp
   X86OptimizeLEAs.cpp
   X86FixupBWInsts.cpp
+  X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp
   )
 
 add_llvm_target(X86CodeGen ${sources})

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86.h?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86.h Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ FunctionPass *createX86FixupLEAs();
 /// recalculations.
 FunctionPass *createX86OptimizeLEAs();
 
+/// Return a pass that expands WinAlloca pseudo-instructions.
+FunctionPass *createX86WinAllocaExpander();
+
 /// Return a pass that optimizes the code-size of x86 call sequences. This is
 /// done by replacing esp-relative movs with pushes.
 FunctionPass *createX86CallFrameOptimization();

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -16563,14 +16563,9 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALL
     Result = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SEG_ALLOCA, dl, SPTy, Chain,
                                 DAG.getRegister(Vreg, SPTy));
   } else {
-    SDValue Flag;
-    const unsigned Reg = (Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64() ? X86::RAX : X86::EAX);
-
-    Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Reg, Size, Flag);
-    Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
     SDVTList NodeTys = DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other, MVT::Glue);
-
-    Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::WIN_ALLOCA, dl, NodeTys, Chain, Flag);
+    Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::WIN_ALLOCA, dl, NodeTys, Chain, Size);
+    MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>()->setHasWinAlloca(true);
 
     const X86RegisterInfo *RegInfo = Subtarget.getRegisterInfo();
     unsigned SPReg = RegInfo->getStackRegister();
@@ -23229,18 +23224,6 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredSegAlloca(
 }
 
 MachineBasicBlock *
-X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredWinAlloca(MachineInstr *MI,
-                                        MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
-  assert(!Subtarget.isTargetMachO());
-  DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
-  MachineInstr *ResumeMI = Subtarget.getFrameLowering()->emitStackProbe(
-      *BB->getParent(), *BB, MI, DL, false);
-  MachineBasicBlock *ResumeBB = ResumeMI->getParent();
-  MI->eraseFromParent(); // The pseudo instruction is gone now.
-  return ResumeBB;
-}
-
-MachineBasicBlock *
 X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredCatchRet(MachineInstr *MI,
                                        MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
   MachineFunction *MF = BB->getParent();
@@ -23702,8 +23685,6 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomIn
   case X86::TLS_base_addr32:
   case X86::TLS_base_addr64:
     return EmitLoweredTLSAddr(MI, BB);
-  case X86::WIN_ALLOCA:
-    return EmitLoweredWinAlloca(MI, BB);
   case X86::CATCHRET:
     return EmitLoweredCatchRet(MI, BB);
   case X86::CATCHPAD:

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -1162,9 +1162,6 @@ namespace llvm {
     MachineBasicBlock *EmitLoweredAtomicFP(MachineInstr *I,
                                            MachineBasicBlock *BB) const;
 
-    MachineBasicBlock *EmitLoweredWinAlloca(MachineInstr *MI,
-                                              MachineBasicBlock *BB) const;
-
     MachineBasicBlock *EmitLoweredCatchRet(MachineInstr *MI,
                                            MachineBasicBlock *BB) const;
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -99,18 +99,6 @@ def VAARG_64 : I<0, Pseudo,
                     (X86vaarg64 addr:$ap, imm:$size, imm:$mode, imm:$align)),
                   (implicit EFLAGS)]>;
 
-// Dynamic stack allocation yields a _chkstk or _alloca call for all Windows
-// targets.  These calls are needed to probe the stack when allocating more than
-// 4k bytes in one go. Touching the stack at 4K increments is necessary to
-// ensure that the guard pages used by the OS virtual memory manager are
-// allocated in correct sequence.
-// The main point of having separate instruction are extra unmodelled effects
-// (compared to ordinary calls) like stack pointer change.
-
-let Defs = [EAX, ESP, EFLAGS], Uses = [ESP] in
-  def WIN_ALLOCA : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins),
-                     "# dynamic stack allocation",
-                     [(X86WinAlloca)]>;
 
 // When using segmented stacks these are lowered into instructions which first
 // check if the current stacklet has enough free memory. If it does, memory is
@@ -132,6 +120,27 @@ def SEG_ALLOCA_64 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs G
                     Requires<[In64BitMode]>;
 }
 
+// Dynamic stack allocation yields a _chkstk or _alloca call for all Windows
+// targets.  These calls are needed to probe the stack when allocating more than
+// 4k bytes in one go. Touching the stack at 4K increments is necessary to
+// ensure that the guard pages used by the OS virtual memory manager are
+// allocated in correct sequence.
+// The main point of having separate instruction are extra unmodelled effects
+// (compared to ordinary calls) like stack pointer change.
+
+let Defs = [EAX, ESP, EFLAGS], Uses = [ESP] in
+def WIN_ALLOCA_32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR32:$size),
+                     "# dynamic stack allocation",
+                     [(X86WinAlloca GR32:$size)]>,
+                     Requires<[NotLP64]>;
+
+let Defs = [RAX, RSP, EFLAGS], Uses = [RSP] in
+def WIN_ALLOCA_64 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR64:$size),
+                     "# dynamic stack allocation",
+                     [(X86WinAlloca GR64:$size)]>,
+                     Requires<[In64BitMode]>;
+
+
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // EH Pseudo Instructions
 //

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ def SDT_X86TLSBASEADDR : SDTypeProfile<0
 
 def SDT_X86TLSCALL : SDTypeProfile<0, 1, [SDTCisInt<0>]>;
 
+def SDT_X86WIN_ALLOCA : SDTypeProfile<0, 1, [SDTCisVT<0, iPTR>]>;
+
 def SDT_X86SEG_ALLOCA : SDTypeProfile<1, 1, [SDTCisVT<0, iPTR>, SDTCisVT<1, iPTR>]>;
 
 def SDT_X86EHRET : SDTypeProfile<0, 1, [SDTCisInt<0>]>;
@@ -273,8 +275,8 @@ def X86bextr  : SDNode<"X86ISD::BEXTR",
 
 def X86mul_imm : SDNode<"X86ISD::MUL_IMM", SDTIntBinOp>;
 
-def X86WinAlloca : SDNode<"X86ISD::WIN_ALLOCA", SDTX86Void,
-                          [SDNPHasChain, SDNPInGlue, SDNPOutGlue]>;
+def X86WinAlloca : SDNode<"X86ISD::WIN_ALLOCA", SDT_X86WIN_ALLOCA,
+                          [SDNPHasChain, SDNPOutGlue]>;
 
 def X86SegAlloca : SDNode<"X86ISD::SEG_ALLOCA", SDT_X86SEG_ALLOCA,
                           [SDNPHasChain]>;

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ class X86MachineFunctionInfo : public Ma
   /// True if this function uses the red zone.
   bool UsesRedZone = false;
 
+  /// True if this function has WIN_ALLOCA instructions.
+  bool HasWinAlloca = false;
+
 private:
   /// ForwardedMustTailRegParms - A list of virtual and physical registers
   /// that must be forwarded to every musttail call.
@@ -172,6 +175,9 @@ public:
 
   bool getUsesRedZone() const { return UsesRedZone; }
   void setUsesRedZone(bool V) { UsesRedZone = V; }
+
+  bool hasWinAlloca() const { return HasWinAlloca; }
+  void setHasWinAlloca(bool v) { HasWinAlloca = v; }
 };
 
 } // End llvm namespace

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ void X86PassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() {
     addPass(createX86OptimizeLEAs());
 
   addPass(createX86CallFrameOptimization());
+  addPass(createX86WinAllocaExpander());
 }
 
 void X86PassConfig::addPostRegAlloc() {

Added: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp?rev=269949&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+//===----- X86WinAllocaExpander.cpp - Expand WinAlloca pseudo instruction -===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file defines a pass that expands WinAlloca pseudo-instructions.
+//
+// It performs a conservative analysis to determine whether each allocation
+// falls within a region of the stack that is safe to use, or whether stack
+// probes must be emitted.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "X86.h"
+#include "X86InstrBuilder.h"
+#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
+#include "X86MachineFunctionInfo.h"
+#include "X86Subtarget.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+namespace {
+
+class X86WinAllocaExpander : public MachineFunctionPass {
+public:
+  X86WinAllocaExpander() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
+
+  bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
+
+private:
+  /// Strategies for lowering a WinAlloca.
+  enum Lowering { TouchAndSub, Sub, Probe };
+
+  /// Deterministic-order map from WinAlloca instruction to desired lowering.
+  typedef MapVector<MachineInstr*, Lowering> LoweringMap;
+
+  /// Compute which lowering to use for each WinAlloca instruction.
+  void computeLowerings(MachineFunction &MF, LoweringMap& Lowerings);
+
+  /// Get the appropriate lowering based on current offset and amount.
+  Lowering getLowering(int64_t CurrentOffset, int64_t AllocaAmount);
+
+  /// Lower a WinAlloca instruction.
+  void lower(MachineInstr* MI, Lowering L);
+
+  MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
+  const X86Subtarget *STI;
+  const TargetInstrInfo *TII;
+  const X86RegisterInfo *TRI;
+  unsigned StackPtr;
+  unsigned SlotSize;
+  int64_t StackProbeSize;
+
+  const char *getPassName() const override { return "X86 WinAlloca Expander"; }
+  static char ID;
+};
+
+char X86WinAllocaExpander::ID = 0;
+
+} // end anonymous namespace
+
+FunctionPass *llvm::createX86WinAllocaExpander() {
+  return new X86WinAllocaExpander();
+}
+
+/// Return the allocation amount for a WinAlloca instruction, or -1 if unknown.
+static int64_t getWinAllocaAmount(MachineInstr *MI, MachineRegisterInfo *MRI) {
+  assert(MI->getOpcode() == X86::WIN_ALLOCA_32 ||
+         MI->getOpcode() == X86::WIN_ALLOCA_64);
+  assert(MI->getOperand(0).isReg());
+
+  unsigned AmountReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+  MachineInstr *Def = MRI->getUniqueVRegDef(AmountReg);
+
+  // Look through copies.
+  while (Def && Def->isCopy() && Def->getOperand(1).isReg())
+    Def = MRI->getUniqueVRegDef(Def->getOperand(1).getReg());
+
+  if (!Def ||
+      (Def->getOpcode() != X86::MOV32ri && Def->getOpcode() != X86::MOV64ri) ||
+      !Def->getOperand(1).isImm())
+    return -1;
+
+  return Def->getOperand(1).getImm();
+}
+
+X86WinAllocaExpander::Lowering
+X86WinAllocaExpander::getLowering(int64_t CurrentOffset,
+                                  int64_t AllocaAmount) {
+  // For a non-constant amount or a large amount, we have to probe.
+  if (AllocaAmount < 0 || AllocaAmount > StackProbeSize)
+    return Probe;
+
+  // If it fits within the safe region of the stack, just subtract.
+  if (CurrentOffset + AllocaAmount <= StackProbeSize)
+    return Sub;
+
+  // Otherwise, touch the current tip of the stack, then subtract.
+  return TouchAndSub;
+}
+
+static bool isPushPop(const MachineInstr &MI) {
+  switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+  case X86::PUSH32i8:
+  case X86::PUSH32r:
+  case X86::PUSH32rmm:
+  case X86::PUSH32rmr:
+  case X86::PUSHi32:
+  case X86::PUSH64i8:
+  case X86::PUSH64r:
+  case X86::PUSH64rmm:
+  case X86::PUSH64rmr:
+  case X86::PUSH64i32:
+  case X86::POP32r:
+  case X86::POP64r:
+    return true;
+  default:
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+void X86WinAllocaExpander::computeLowerings(MachineFunction &MF,
+                                            LoweringMap &Lowerings) {
+  // Do a one-pass reverse post-order walk of the CFG to conservatively estimate
+  // the offset between the stack pointer and the lowest touched part of the
+  // stack, and use that to decide how to lower each WinAlloca instruction.
+
+  // Initialize OutOffset[B], the stack offset at exit from B, to something big.
+  DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock *, int64_t> OutOffset;
+  for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF)
+    OutOffset[&MBB] = INT32_MAX;
+
+  // Note: we don't know the offset at the start of the entry block since the
+  // prologue hasn't been inserted yet, and how much that will adjust the stack
+  // pointer depends on register spills, which have not been computed yet.
+
+  // Compute the reverse post-order.
+  ReversePostOrderTraversal<MachineFunction*> RPO(&MF);
+
+  for (MachineBasicBlock *MBB : RPO) {
+    int64_t Offset = -1;
+    for (MachineBasicBlock *Pred : MBB->predecessors())
+      Offset = std::max(Offset, OutOffset[Pred]);
+    if (Offset == -1) Offset = INT32_MAX;
+
+    for (MachineInstr &MI : *MBB) {
+      if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::WIN_ALLOCA_32 ||
+          MI.getOpcode() == X86::WIN_ALLOCA_64) {
+        // A WinAlloca moves StackPtr, and potentially touches it.
+        int64_t Amount = getWinAllocaAmount(&MI, MRI);
+        Lowering L = getLowering(Offset, Amount);
+        Lowerings[&MI] = L;
+        switch (L) {
+        case Sub:
+          Offset += Amount;
+          break;
+        case TouchAndSub:
+          Offset = Amount;
+          break;
+        case Probe:
+          Offset = 0;
+          break;
+        }
+      } else if (MI.isCall() || isPushPop(MI)) {
+        // Calls, pushes and pops touch the tip of the stack.
+        Offset = 0;
+      } else if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::ADJCALLSTACKUP32 ||
+                 MI.getOpcode() == X86::ADJCALLSTACKUP64) {
+        Offset -= MI.getOperand(0).getImm();
+      } else if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::ADJCALLSTACKDOWN32 ||
+                 MI.getOpcode() == X86::ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64) {
+        Offset += MI.getOperand(0).getImm();
+      } else if (MI.modifiesRegister(StackPtr, TRI)) {
+        // Any other modification of SP means we've lost track of it.
+        Offset = INT32_MAX;
+      }
+    }
+
+    OutOffset[MBB] = Offset;
+  }
+}
+
+static unsigned getSubOpcode(bool Is64Bit, int64_t Amount) {
+  if (Is64Bit)
+    return isInt<8>(Amount) ? X86::SUB64ri8 : X86::SUB64ri32;
+  return isInt<8>(Amount) ? X86::SUB32ri8 : X86::SUB32ri;
+}
+
+void X86WinAllocaExpander::lower(MachineInstr* MI, Lowering L) {
+  DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
+  MachineBasicBlock *MBB = MI->getParent();
+  MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = *MI;
+
+  int64_t Amount = getWinAllocaAmount(MI, MRI);
+  if (Amount == 0) {
+    MI->eraseFromParent();
+    return;
+  }
+
+  bool Is64Bit = STI->is64Bit();
+  assert(SlotSize == 4 || SlotSize == 8);
+  unsigned RegA = (SlotSize == 8) ? X86::RAX : X86::EAX;
+
+  switch (L) {
+  case TouchAndSub:
+    assert(Amount >= SlotSize);
+
+    // Use a push to touch the top of the stack.
+    BuildMI(*MBB, I, DL, TII->get(Is64Bit ? X86::PUSH64r : X86::PUSH32r))
+        .addReg(RegA, RegState::Undef);
+    Amount -= SlotSize;
+    if (!Amount)
+      break;
+
+    // Fall through to make any remaining adjustment.
+  case Sub:
+    assert(Amount > 0);
+    if (Amount == SlotSize) {
+      // Use push to save size.
+      BuildMI(*MBB, I, DL, TII->get(Is64Bit ? X86::PUSH64r : X86::PUSH32r))
+          .addReg(RegA, RegState::Undef);
+    } else {
+      // Sub.
+      BuildMI(*MBB, I, DL, TII->get(getSubOpcode(Is64Bit, Amount)), StackPtr)
+          .addReg(StackPtr)
+          .addImm(Amount);
+    }
+    break;
+  case Probe:
+    // The probe lowering expects the amount in RAX/EAX.
+    BuildMI(*MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), RegA)
+        .addReg(MI->getOperand(0).getReg());
+
+    // Do the probe.
+    STI->getFrameLowering()->emitStackProbe(*MBB->getParent(), *MBB, MI, DL,
+                                            /*InPrologue=*/false);
+    break;
+  }
+
+  unsigned AmountReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+  MI->eraseFromParent();
+
+  // Delete the definition of AmountReg, possibly walking a chain of copies.
+  for (;;) {
+    if (!MRI->use_empty(AmountReg))
+      break;
+    MachineInstr *AmountDef = MRI->getUniqueVRegDef(AmountReg);
+    if (!AmountDef)
+      break;
+    if (AmountDef->isCopy() && AmountDef->getOperand(1).isReg())
+      AmountReg = AmountDef->getOperand(1).isReg();
+    AmountDef->eraseFromParent();
+    break;
+  }
+}
+
+bool X86WinAllocaExpander::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
+  if (!MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>()->hasWinAlloca())
+    return false;
+
+  MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
+  STI = &MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
+  TII = STI->getInstrInfo();
+  TRI = STI->getRegisterInfo();
+  StackPtr = TRI->getStackRegister();
+  SlotSize = TRI->getSlotSize();
+
+  StackProbeSize = 4096;
+  if (MF.getFunction()->hasFnAttribute("stack-probe-size")) {
+    MF.getFunction()
+        ->getFnAttribute("stack-probe-size")
+        .getValueAsString()
+        .getAsInteger(0, StackProbeSize);
+  }
+
+  LoweringMap Lowerings;
+  computeLowerings(MF, Lowerings);
+  for (auto &P : Lowerings)
+    lower(P.first, P.second);
+
+  return true;
+}

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cleanuppad-inalloca.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cleanuppad-inalloca.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cleanuppad-inalloca.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cleanuppad-inalloca.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ ehcleanup:
 ; CHECK: pushl %ebp
 ; CHECK: movl %esp, %ebp
 ; CHECK: subl ${{[0-9]+}}, %esp
-; CHECK: movl $8, %eax
-; CHECK: calll __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
 ; CHECK: calll "??0A@@QAE at XZ"
 ; CHECK: calll "??0A@@QAE at XZ"
 ; CHECK: calll _takes_two

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/dynamic-alloca-in-entry.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/dynamic-alloca-in-entry.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/dynamic-alloca-in-entry.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/dynamic-alloca-in-entry.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ define void @bar() {
   ret void
 }
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _bar:
-; CHECK: calll __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
 ; CHECK: retl

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-ctor.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-ctor.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-ctor.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-ctor.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ define void @g() {
 entry:
   %args = alloca inalloca %frame
   %c = getelementptr %frame, %frame* %args, i32 0, i32 2
-; CHECK: movl    $20, %eax
-; CHECK: calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
+; CHECK: subl    $16, %esp
 ; CHECK: movl %esp,
   call void @Foo_ctor(%Foo* %c)
 ; CHECK: leal 12(%{{.*}}),

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-invoke.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-invoke.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-invoke.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-invoke.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ blah:
   %beg = getelementptr %frame.reverse, %frame.reverse* %rev_args, i32 0, i32 0
   %end = getelementptr %frame.reverse, %frame.reverse* %rev_args, i32 0, i32 1
 
-; CHECK:  calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK:  pushl   %eax
+; CHECK:  subl    $20, %esp
 ; CHECK:  movl %esp, %[[beg:[^ ]*]]
 ; CHECK:  leal 12(%[[beg]]), %[[end:[^ ]*]]
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-stdcall.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-stdcall.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-stdcall.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca-stdcall.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ declare x86_stdcallcc void @i(i32 %a)
 define void @g() {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _g:
   %b = alloca inalloca %Foo
-; CHECK: movl    $8, %eax
-; CHECK: calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
   %f1 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 0
   %f2 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 1
   store i32 13, i32* %f1

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/inalloca.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ define void @a() {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _a:
 entry:
   %b = alloca inalloca %Foo
-; CHECK: movl    $8, %eax
-; CHECK: calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
   %f1 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 0
   %f2 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 1
   store i32 13, i32* %f1
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ define void @b() {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _b:
 entry:
   %b = alloca inalloca %Foo
-; CHECK: movl    $8, %eax
-; CHECK: calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
   %f1 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 0
   %f2 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 1
   store i32 13, i32* %f1
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ define void @c() {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _c:
 entry:
   %b = alloca inalloca %Foo
-; CHECK: movl    $8, %eax
-; CHECK: calll   __chkstk
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
+; CHECK: pushl   %eax
   %f1 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 0
   %f2 = getelementptr %Foo, %Foo* %b, i32 0, i32 1
   store i32 13, i32* %f1

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shrink-wrap-chkstk.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shrink-wrap-chkstk.ll?rev=269949&r1=269948&r2=269949&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shrink-wrap-chkstk.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/shrink-wrap-chkstk.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 target datalayout = "e-m:x-p:32:32-i64:64-f80:32-n8:16:32-a:0:32-S32"
 target triple = "i686-pc-windows-msvc18.0.0"
 
-%struct.S = type { [12 x i8] }
+%struct.S = type { [8192 x i8] }
 
 define x86_thiscallcc void @call_inalloca(i1 %x) {
 entry:
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ bb2:
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _call_inalloca: # @call_inalloca
 ; CHECK: pushl %ebp
 ; CHECK: movl %esp, %ebp
-; CHECK: movl $12, %eax
+; CHECK: movl $8192, %eax
 ; CHECK: calll __chkstk
 ; CHECK: calll _inalloca_params
 ; CHECK: movl %ebp, %esp

Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win-alloca-expander.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win-alloca-expander.ll?rev=269949&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win-alloca-expander.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win-alloca-expander.ll Wed May 18 11:10:17 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 -O0
+
+%struct.S = type { [1024 x i8] }
+%struct.T = type { [3000 x i8] }
+%struct.U = type { [10000 x i8] }
+
+define void @basics() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: basics:
+entry:
+  br label %bb1
+
+; Allocation move sizes should have been removed.
+; CHECK-NOT: movl $1024
+; CHECK-NOT: movl $3000
+
+bb1:
+  %p0 = alloca %struct.S
+; The allocation is small enough not to require stack probing, but the %esp
+; offset after the prologue is not known, so the stack must be touched before
+; the pointer is adjusted.
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $1020, %esp
+
+  %saved_stack = tail call i8* @llvm.stacksave()
+
+  %p1 = alloca %struct.S
+; We know the %esp offset from above, so there is no need to touch the stack
+; before adjusting it.
+; CHECK: subl $1024, %esp
+
+  %p2 = alloca %struct.T
+; The offset is now 2048 bytes, so allocating a T must touch the stack again.
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $2996, %esp
+
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p0)
+; CHECK: calll
+
+  %p3 = alloca %struct.T
+; The call above touched the stack, so there is room for a T object.
+; CHECK: subl $3000, %esp
+
+  %p4 = alloca %struct.U
+; The U object is large enough to require stack probing.
+; CHECK: movl $10000, %eax
+; CHECK: calll __chkstk
+
+  %p5 = alloca %struct.T
+; The stack probing above touched the tip of the stack, so there's room for a T.
+; CHECK: subl $3000, %esp
+
+  call void @llvm.stackrestore(i8* %saved_stack)
+  %p6 = alloca %struct.S
+; The stack restore means we lose track of the stack pointer and must probe.
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $1020, %esp
+
+; Use the pointers so they're not optimized away.
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p1)
+  call void @g(%struct.T* %p2)
+  call void @g(%struct.T* %p3)
+  call void @h(%struct.U* %p4)
+  call void @g(%struct.T* %p5)
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @loop() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: loop:
+entry:
+  br label %bb1
+
+bb1:
+  %p1 = alloca %struct.S
+; The entry offset is unknown; touch-and-sub.
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $1020, %esp
+  br label %loop1
+
+loop1:
+  %i1 = phi i32 [ 10, %bb1 ], [ %dec1, %loop1 ]
+  %p2 = alloca %struct.S
+; We know the incoming offset from bb1, but from the back-edge, we assume the
+; worst, and therefore touch-and-sub to allocate.
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $1020, %esp
+  %dec1 = sub i32 %i1, 1
+  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %i1, 0
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %loop1, label %end
+; CHECK: decl
+; CHECK: jg
+
+end:
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p1)
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p2)
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @probe_size_attribute() "stack-probe-size"="512" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: probe_size_attribute:
+entry:
+  br label %bb1
+
+bb1:
+  %p0 = alloca %struct.S
+; The allocation would be small enough not to require probing, if it wasn't
+; for the stack-probe-size attribute.
+; CHECK: movl $1024, %eax
+; CHECK: calll __chkstk
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p0)
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @cfg(i1 %x, i1 %y) {
+; Test that the blocks are analyzed in the correct order.
+; CHECK-LABEL: cfg:
+entry:
+  br i1 %x, label %bb1, label %bb2
+
+bb1:
+  %p1 = alloca %struct.S
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $1020, %esp
+  br label %bb3
+bb2:
+  %p2 = alloca %struct.T
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $2996, %esp
+  br label %bb3
+
+bb3:
+  br i1 %y, label %bb4, label %bb5
+
+bb4:
+  %p4 = alloca %struct.S
+; CHECK: subl $1024, %esp
+  call void @f(%struct.S* %p4)
+  ret void
+
+bb5:
+  %p5 = alloca %struct.T
+; CHECK: pushl %eax
+; CHECK: subl $2996, %esp
+  call void @g(%struct.T* %p5)
+  ret void
+}
+
+
+declare void @f(%struct.S*)
+declare void @g(%struct.T*)
+declare void @h(%struct.U*)
+
+declare i8* @llvm.stacksave()
+declare void @llvm.stackrestore(i8*)




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list