[PATCH] D20260: IR: Introduce local_unnamed_addr attribute.

[Mehdi Amini via llvm-commits]

Seriously I absolutely don't get the "start a new revision" thing because the initial email was not on llvm-commit. Really what is the rational?

We are losing the history and the threading for the review, this is really annoying.

So big -1

-- 
Mehdi


> On May 17, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> chandlerc added a subscriber: chandlerc.
> chandlerc added a comment.
> 
> Folks, llvm-commits wasn't even on the original version of this patch, and there is essentially no high-level description of the problem being solved or the motivation of the patch.
> 
> Can you start a fresh revision in phab and actually include a *lot* more context? I suspect many, many people will be very interested in something as impactful as a new variant of 'unnamed_addr' and they may (like me) have completely missed the discussion taking place here or lack significant context for it.
> 
> 
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D20260
> 
> 
>