[PATCH] D19609: [ARM] Add support for long-call/short-call attribute

[Weiming Zhao via llvm-commits]

weimingz added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19609#414304, @t.p.northover wrote:

> Hmm, on the other hand annotating the call-site isn't going to work for indirect calls that become apparent after optimization. Annotating the callee's declaration looks like it happens to work in that case.


Should we still use taget-features to hold the flag?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D19609