[PATCH] D18321: Add support for no-jump-tables
Hans Wennborg via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 23 11:43:59 PDT 2016
hans added a comment.
I missed where someone suggested making this a function attribute.
What's the motivation for wanting some functions to get jump tables, and not others? Isn't it something you'd want for the whole program?
What happens if a function with nousejumptable gets inlined into a function without the attribute?
More information about the llvm-commits