[PATCH] D18321: Add support for no-jump-tables

Hans Wennborg via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 23 11:43:59 PDT 2016

hans added a comment.

I missed where someone suggested making this a function attribute.

What's the motivation for wanting some functions to get jump tables, and not others? Isn't it something you'd want for the whole program?

What happens if a function with nousejumptable gets inlined into a function without the attribute?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list