[PATCH] D16857: More detailed memory dependence checking between volatile and non-volatile accesses

Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 22 15:20:33 PST 2016

kparzysz added a comment.

To clarify last comment: I tried creating a testcase using GVN and DSE, and in both cases, either the non-load-or-store instruction was handled by the optimization itself, or the "getDependence" function did not follow the desired path within the memory dependence analysis.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list