[PATCH] D17041: [X86] Don't assume that a shuffle operand is #0: it isn't for VPERMV.
Ahmed Bougacha via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 22 12:26:52 PST 2016
ab added a subscriber: craig.topper.
ab added a comment.
Ping of sorts: Elena, all, how do you think we should fix this: swap the VPERMV operands, or change all of our code to stop assuming the mask is the last operand (this patch)? I don't do much AVX512, so I'm not comfortable making that decision.
More information about the llvm-commits