[PATCH] D17041: [X86] Don't assume that a shuffle operand is #0: it isn't for VPERMV.

Ahmed Bougacha via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 22 12:26:52 PST 2016

ab added a subscriber: craig.topper.
ab added a comment.

Ping of sorts: Elena, all, how do you think we should fix this: swap the VPERMV operands, or change all of our code to stop assuming the mask is the last operand (this patch)?  I don't do much AVX512, so I'm not comfortable making that decision.


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list