[PATCH] D17381: [Polly] [RFC] Access level dependency analysis

[Hongbin Zheng via llvm-commits]

etherzhhb added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
etherzhhb added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17381#355679, @llvm-commits wrote:

> > Build dependence information based on tagged access [1], e.g. for access:
>
> > 
>
> >   MustWriteAccess :=  [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
>
> >       [N] -> { Stmt_for_body[i0] -> MemRef_b[6 + i0] };
>
> > 
>
> > we build tag it and get:
>
> > 
>
> > [X] -> {[Stmt_for_body[i0] -> MemRef_a[]] -> MemRef_b[6 + i0] };
>
>
> Why does it say MemRef_a and then MemRef_b ?
>
> - F1531854: signature.asc <http://reviews.llvm.org/F1531854>
> - F1531853: msg-31894-385.txt <http://reviews.llvm.org/F1531853>


Updated


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D17381