[llvm-dev] [PATCH] strlen -> strnlen optimization
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 7 13:26:44 PST 2016
> On 2016-Feb-07, at 10:45, Mehdi Amini via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Feb 6, 2016, at 11:40 PM, Michael McConville <mmcco at mykolab.com> wrote:
>> Mehdi Amini wrote:
>>> Also it seems that your patch was inline in the email and not
>>> attached? I couldn't apply it for some reason.
>> I see. I mostly work with projects that use inline patches (BSDs) so I
>> thought that was the preferred method. I'm surprised to hear that it
>> wouldn't apply because I'm using Mutt. Anyway, I'll attach in the
> Oh I thon kit is probably *my* client, and since we don't use much inline diff here, I'm not use to workaround it.
Yeah, at least one of the mail clients that's commonly used by LLVM
folks doesn't handle inline patches well, so the policy is to always
attach a patch.
More information about the llvm-commits