[lld] r256309 - Fix two asan found bugs:

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits]

On 4 January 2016 at 13:33, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Cool!
> I wonder if it makes sense to have a fuzzer for lld, similar to what we have
> for clang and clang-format?

Maybe, it probably depends on what we are fuzzing for.

Broken .o files are really uncommon, unless one is working on a
producer (MC). For lld itself we have so far been using a "don't
crash" policy, but not much more. For example, we will produce garbage
if given ABI invalid TLS relocations.

Cheers,
Rafael