[llvm] r256459 - InstrProfTest.cpp: Don't assume string literals are always merged.

Xinliang David Li via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Dec 27 08:00:53 PST 2015


LGTM.  Thanks for the fix.

David

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Author: chapuni
> Date: Sun Dec 27 00:18:57 2015
> New Revision: 256459
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=256459&view=rev
> Log:
> InstrProfTest.cpp: Don't assume string literals are always merged.
>
> MSC18 Debug didn't merge them.
>
> FIXME: I tweaked just to appease a builder. Almost string literals should
> be addressed identically there.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp?rev=256459&r1=256458&r2=256459&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp Sun Dec 27 00:18:57
> 2015
> @@ -226,57 +226,63 @@ TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_rea
>  }
>
>  TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1) {
> -  InstrProfRecord Record11("caller", 0x1234, {1, 2});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record12("caller", 0x1234, {1, 2});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record2("callee1", 0x1235, {3, 4});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record3("callee2", 0x1235, {3, 4});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record4("callee3", 0x1235, {3, 4});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record5("callee3", 0x1235, {3, 4});
> -  InstrProfRecord Record6("callee4", 0x1235, {3, 5});
> +  static const char caller[] = "caller";
> +  static const char callee1[] = "callee1";
> +  static const char callee2[] = "callee2";
> +  static const char callee3[] = "callee3";
> +  static const char callee4[] = "callee4";
> +
> +  InstrProfRecord Record11(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record12(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record2(callee1, 0x1235, {3, 4});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record3(callee2, 0x1235, {3, 4});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record4(callee3, 0x1235, {3, 4});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record5(callee3, 0x1235, {3, 4});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record6(callee4, 0x1235, {3, 5});
>
>    // 5 value sites.
>    Record11.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5);
> -  InstrProfValueData VD0[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee1", 1},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee2", 2},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee4", 4}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD0[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 1},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee2), 2},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee3), 3},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee4), 4}};
>    Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD0, 4, nullptr);
>
>    // No valeu profile data at the second site.
>    Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
>
> -  InstrProfValueData VD2[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee1", 1},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee2", 2},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD2[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 1},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee2), 2},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee3), 3}};
>    Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 2, VD2, 3, nullptr);
>
> -  InstrProfValueData VD3[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee1", 1}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD3[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 1}};
>    Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 3, VD3, 1, nullptr);
>
> -  InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee1", 1},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee2", 2},
> -                              {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 1},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee2), 2},
> +                              {uint64_t(callee3), 3}};
>    Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 4, VD4, 3, nullptr);
>
>    // A differnt record for the same caller.
>    Record12.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5);
> -  InstrProfValueData VD02[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee2", 5},
> -                               {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD02[] = {{uint64_t(callee2), 5},
> +                               {uint64_t(callee3), 3}};
>    Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD02, 2, nullptr);
>
>    // No valeu profile data at the second site.
>    Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
>
> -  InstrProfValueData VD22[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee2", 1},
> -                               {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3},
> -                               {(uint64_t) "callee4", 4}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD22[] = {{uint64_t(callee2), 1},
> +                               {uint64_t(callee3), 3},
> +                               {uint64_t(callee4), 4}};
>    Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 2, VD22, 3, nullptr);
>
>    Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 3, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
>
> -  InstrProfValueData VD42[] = {{(uint64_t) "callee1", 1},
> -                               {(uint64_t) "callee2", 2},
> -                               {(uint64_t) "callee3", 3}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD42[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 1},
> +                               {uint64_t(callee2), 2},
> +                               {uint64_t(callee3), 3}};
>    Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 4, VD42, 3, nullptr);
>
>    Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record11));
> @@ -351,6 +357,8 @@ TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_mer
>  }
>
>  TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1_saturation) {
> +  static const char bar[] = "bar";
> +
>    const uint64_t Max = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
>
>    InstrProfRecord Record1("foo", 0x1234, {1});
> @@ -362,13 +370,13 @@ TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_mer
>    auto Result2 = Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record2));
>    ASSERT_EQ(Result2, instrprof_error::counter_overflow);
>
> -  InstrProfRecord Record3("bar", 0x9012, {8});
> +  InstrProfRecord Record3(bar, 0x9012, {8});
>    auto Result3 = Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record3));
>    ASSERT_EQ(Result3, instrprof_error::success);
>
>    InstrProfRecord Record4("baz", 0x5678, {3, 4});
>    Record4.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1);
> -  InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{(uint64_t) "bar", 1}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{uint64_t(bar), 1}};
>    Record4.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD4, 1, nullptr);
>    auto Result4 = Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record4));
>    ASSERT_EQ(Result4, instrprof_error::success);
> @@ -376,7 +384,7 @@ TEST_F(InstrProfTest, get_icall_data_mer
>    // Verify value data counter overflow.
>    InstrProfRecord Record5("baz", 0x5678, {5, 6});
>    Record5.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1);
> -  InstrProfValueData VD5[] = {{(uint64_t) "bar", Max}};
> +  InstrProfValueData VD5[] = {{uint64_t(bar), Max}};
>    Record5.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD5, 1, nullptr);
>    auto Result5 = Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record5));
>    ASSERT_EQ(Result5, instrprof_error::counter_overflow);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151227/8a49ae4f/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list