[polly] r256199 - Add option to assume single-loop scops with sufficient compute are profitable

Johannes Doerfert via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 22 05:31:05 PST 2015

On 12/22, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 12:09 PM, Johannes Doerfert wrote:
> >In this spirit I would like to change the default heuristic to:
> >   #loops + #blocks > 2
> >as that is the condition under which we can perform "by default enabled"
> >optimizations.
> If this results in run-time benefits for at least one application we care
> about and no run-time regressions, then I think this is fine.
> (I care a little less about compile-time regressions. The more we expose
> them, the more visible they become and the more likely we are
> to add improvements here).
It will at least trigger distribution on Spec2006 hmmer. I think that's
worth it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151222/dce5c4ea/attachment.sig>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list