[llvm] r254945 - Use updated threshold for indirect call bonus

Easwaran Raman via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 7 13:21:20 PST 2015


Author: eraman
Date: Mon Dec  7 15:21:20 2015
New Revision: 254945

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=254945&view=rev
Log:
Use updated threshold for indirect call bonus

When considering foo->bar inlining, if there is an indirect call in foo which gets resolved to a direct call (say baz), then we try to inline baz into bar with a threshold T and subtract max(T - Cost(bar->baz), 0) from Cost(foo->bar). This patch uses max(Threshold(bar->baz) - Cost(bar->baz)) instead, where Thresheld(bar->baz) could be different from T due to bonuses or subtractions. Threshold(bar->baz) - Cost(bar->baz) better represents the desirability of inlining baz into bar.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14309


Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp?rev=254945&r1=254944&r2=254945&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp Mon Dec  7 15:21:20 2015
@@ -834,8 +834,8 @@ bool CallAnalyzer::visitCallSite(CallSit
   CallAnalyzer CA(TTI, ACT, *F, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold, CS);
   if (CA.analyzeCall(CS)) {
     // We were able to inline the indirect call! Subtract the cost from the
-    // bonus we want to apply, but don't go below zero.
-    Cost -= std::max(0, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold - CA.getCost());
+    // threshold to get the bonus we want to apply, but don't go below zero.
+    Cost -= std::max(0, CA.getThreshold() - CA.getCost());
   }
 
   return Base::visitCallSite(CS);




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list