Buildbot numbers for week of 11/22/2015 - 11/28/2015
David Blaikie via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 30 17:05:37 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the useful suggestions, I will work on these.
>
> >I guess the entries with no entry in the failed column have zero failures?
> Yes.
>
> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer |
> 31 | 31 |
> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-detect-only |
> 31 | 27 | 05:28:12
>
> These /\ two builders failed most of the time, but they also only ran a
> handful of times. I guess they're triggering off polly changes only? I
> wonder if they should trigger off LLVM changes too, but I'm not sure.
>
> They build on llvm changes also, but they both build for quite a long
> time. I think it's the reason why they do not build more.
>
Ah, OK - so the other suggestions might help demonstrate/understand that
behavior better.
Tobias - any idea why these builders are /quite/ so slow & whether they
could be improved? With large blame lists that come from a small number of
slaves on a slow builder task it makes them hard to action. Are they useful
to you?
- Dave
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for tracking these results, Galina
>>
>> I think it might be better to send these to the -dev lists, rather than
>> the -commits lists, but I'm not sure what other people think on that.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 11/22/2015 -
>>> 11/28/2015.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Top 10 fastest builders(not docs):
>>>
>>> lldb-amd64-ninja-freebsd11
>>> clang-bpf-build
>>> llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03
>>> sanitizer-windows
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx11
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx1z
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-unstable-abi
>>> llvm-hexagon-elf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 10 most slow builders:
>>>
>>> clang-native-arm-lnt-perf
>>> clang-native-aarch64-full
>>> clang-atom-d525-fedora
>>> clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-detect-only
>>> clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon
>>> llvm-mips-linux
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Number of commits by project:
>>>
>>> project | commits
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> llvm | 218
>>> cfe | 67
>>> compiler-rt | 33
>>> lld | 30
>>> lldb | 23
>>> polly | 8
>>> clang-tools-extra | 7
>>> libcxx | 4
>>> llgo | 1
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> 391
>>>
>>>
>>> Number of completed builds, failed builds and average build time for
>>> successful builds per active builder:
>>>
>>
>> Maybe we could sort this \/ list by some ratio of failed/completed?
>>
>> I guess the entries with no entry in the failed column have zero failures?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> buildername | completed
>>> | failed | time
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> clang-aarch64-lnt | 56
>>> | 3 | 02:31:36
>>> clang-atom-d525-fedora | 21
>>> | 5 | 08:06:27
>>> clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel | 80
>>> | 12 | 01:31:08
>>> clang-bpf-build | 239
>>> | 47 | 00:02:59
>>> clang-cmake-aarch64-42vma | 214
>>> | 80 | 00:16:33
>>> clang-cmake-aarch64-full | 1
>>> | | 03:17:48
>>> clang-cmake-aarch64-quick | 178
>>> | 64 | 00:22:56
>>> clang-cmake-armv7-a15 | 170
>>> | 9 | 00:27:14
>>> clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full | 135
>>> | 31 | 00:47:54
>>> clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost | 41
>>> | 17 | 04:13:48
>>> clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon | 38
>>> | 18 | 05:04:39
>>> clang-cmake-mips | 158
>>> | 50 | 00:27:47
>>> clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15 | 157
>>> | 22 | 00:27:57
>>> clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh | 28
>>> | 12 | 06:13:18
>>> clang-hexagon-elf | 139
>>> | 12 | 00:16:00
>>> clang-native-aarch64-full | 16
>>> | 5 | 08:14:29
>>> clang-native-arm-lnt | 107
>>> | 17 | 01:08:19
>>> clang-native-arm-lnt-perf | 25
>>> | 11 | 08:40:48
>>> clang-ppc64-elf-linux | 110
>>> | 3 | 01:01:45
>>> clang-ppc64-elf-linux2 | 83
>>> | 14 | 01:31:11
>>> clang-sphinx-docs | 111
>>> | | 00:00:20
>>> clang-x64-ninja-win7 | 158
>>> | 28 | 00:34:54
>>> clang-x86-win2008-selfhost | 110
>>> | 17 | 01:02:17
>>> clang-x86_64-darwin13-cross-arm | 197
>>> | 5 | 00:19:48
>>> clang-x86_64-darwin13-cross-mingw32 | 184
>>> | 5 | 00:23:16
>>> clang-x86_64-debian-fast | 137
>>> | 24 | 00:10:32
>>> clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test | 243
>>> | 3 | 00:18:45
>>> clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules | 212
>>> | 45 | 00:15:08
>>> clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75 | 131
>>> | 45 | 00:49:38
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-arm-linux | 4
>>> | | 01:09:42
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian | 4
>>> | | 00:08:08
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian | 4
>>> | | 00:08:33
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions | 4
>>> | | 00:08:03
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-asan | 4
>>> | | 00:08:25
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03 | 4
>>> | | 00:04:29
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx11 | 4
>>> | | 00:05:21
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14 | 4
>>> | | 00:05:32
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx1z | 4
>>> | | 00:05:31
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-msan | 4
>>> | | 00:17:32
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-tsan | 4
>>> | | 00:12:18
>>> libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-unstable-abi | 4
>>> | | 00:05:36
>>> libcxx-sphinx-docs | 4
>>> | | 00:00:09
>>> lld-sphinx-docs | 99
>>> | 99 |
>>> lld-x86_64-darwin13 | 204
>>> | 16 | 00:10:53
>>> lld-x86_64-freebsd | 110
>>> | 3 | 00:51:39
>>> lld-x86_64-win7 | 202
>>> | | 00:08:58
>>> lldb-amd64-ninja-freebsd11 | 57
>>> | 5 | 00:01:42
>>> lldb-amd64-ninja-netbsd7 | 144
>>> | 6 | 00:44:27
>>> lldb-windows7-android | 122
>>> | 105 | 00:42:15
>>> lldb-x86-win7-msvc | 231
>>> | 4 | 00:09:03
>>> lldb-x86-windows-msvc | 197
>>> | 3 | 00:18:58
>>> lldb-x86_64-darwin-13.4 | 125
>>> | 38 | 00:55:53
>>> lldb-x86_64-debian-clang | 253
>>> | 253 |
>>> lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-android | 118
>>> | 27 | 00:56:37
>>> lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-buildserver | 139
>>> | 18 | 00:50:20
>>> lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake | 193
>>> | 34 | 00:24:37
>>> lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10 | 151
>>> | 151 |
>>> llvm-aarch64-linux | 98
>>> | 24 | 01:00:32
>>> llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast | 176
>>> | 32 | 00:21:37
>>> llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast | 288
>>> | 66 | 00:03:15
>>> llvm-hexagon-elf | 130
>>> | 12 | 00:06:36
>>> llvm-mips-linux | 32
>>> | 10 | 04:58:01
>>> llvm-ppc64-linux1 | 111
>>> | 5 | 00:49:07
>>> llvm-ppc64-linux2 | 111
>>> | 5 | 00:49:13
>>> llvm-s390x-linux1 | 156
>>> | 8 | 00:23:11
>>> llvm-sphinx-docs | 95
>>> | 19 | 00:00:18
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3 | 45
>>> | 23 | 05:54:05
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly | 92
>>> | 32 | 05:38:37
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer | 31
>>> | 31 |
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-detect-only | 31
>>> | 27 | 05:28:12
>>>
>>
>> These /\ two builders failed most of the time, but they also only ran a
>> handful of times. I guess they're triggering off polly changes only? I
>> wonder if they should trigger off LLVM changes too, but I'm not sure.
>>
>> It might be worth looking at "patches per run" to see how whether the
>> builders are too slow to keep up with the incoming patch rate, etc. (just
>> seeing the number of builds doesn't tell us this, since some are triggering
>> off low-utilization projects so they won't need to build often)
>>
>>
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast | 227
>>> | 32 | 00:10:35
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-parallel-fast | 175
>>> | 29 | 00:11:52
>>> perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-unprofitable | 174
>>> | 29 | 00:14:13
>>> polly-amd64-linux | 191
>>> | 32 | 00:12:02
>>> ppc64le-clang | 44
>>> | 7 | 03:24:04
>>> ppc64le-clanglnt | 67
>>> | 3 | 02:02:53
>>> ppc64le-llvm | 67
>>> | 3 | 01:51:20
>>> sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 | 147
>>> | 7 | 00:40:46
>>> sanitizer-ppc64le-linux | 127
>>> | 6 | 00:51:32
>>> sanitizer-windows | 272
>>> | 153 | 00:05:01
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux | 81
>>> | 36 | 01:41:09
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf | 253
>>> | 34 | 00:11:23
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap | 51
>>> | 40 | 04:13:56
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast | 158
>>> | 125 | 00:48:54
>>> sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fuzzer | 149
>>> | 30 | 00:46:12
>>> sanitizer_x86_64-freebsd | 186
>>> | 186 |
>>>
>>
>> If I recall correctly, this last builder was failing all the way through
>> the last summary you sent too? Perhaps we should disable it?
>>
>>
>>> (86 rows)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151130/9a36997c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list