[PATCH] D14769: [FunctionAttrs] Calls to libcalls don't cause a function to potentially recurse

Duncan Exon Smith via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 18 10:26:45 PST 2015


Yeah, this would have been nice :(.  There might be something you can do for certain LLVM intrinsics?

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 5:00 AM, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote:
> 
> jmolloy abandoned this revision.
> jmolloy added a comment.
> 
> Hi Duncan,
> 
> Damn, you're right. I didn't even consider atexit handlers. And that noreturn case is true too. I'll abandon this.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> James
> 
> 
> Repository:
>  rL LLVM
> 
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D14769
> 
> 
> 


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list