buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x64-ninja-win7

Galina Kistanova via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 23 09:39:57 PDT 2015


Hello Sanjoy,

This particular builder does not accept a "clean" property from the UI.
I'll update it later to make it do so.

Thanks

Galina



On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
wrote:

> Galina,
>
> Can you please take a look to see if I'm setting the 'clobber' flag
> correctly in the two builds above?  Are there other ways I can force
> the bot do a "full" build?
>
> Generally speaking, I don't think the second stage of a bootstrap bot
> should do an incremental build -- that is equivalent to running only a
> small percentage of the test suite. :)
>
> -- Sanjoy
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Sanjoy Das
> <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
> > I see the same problem with "clobber" builds.
> >
> > 251048 with clobber fails:
> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/6418
> > 251045 with clobber fails:
> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/6420
> >
> > However, it does not look like that setting clobber to 1 actually
> > worked -- for instance, SmallVector.cpp isn't in the build logs for
> > 6420 or 6418.
> >
> > -- Sanjoy
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Evgenii Stepanov
> > <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You can request a full rebuild by adding "clobber" as "property 1
> >> name" and "1" as its value in the force build form, if you suspect
> >> that the problem lies there.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-commits
> >> <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>> It looks like both 251045 and 251048 trigger the same failure:
> >>>
> >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/6416 --
> 251045
> >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/6415 --
> 251048
> >>>
> >>> 251048 is my first change, and 251045 is the change right before.
> >>> Also IIRC the buildbot *was* green on 251045.  Any idea what's going
> >>> on?
> >>>
> >>> It is possible that the changes I made miscompiled a .o file that was
> >>> not re-built in the above two builds.  However it was definitely
> >>> re-built when going *from* 251045 to 251053 (since otherwise the
> >>> miscompile would not have manifested), so the source file in 251045
> >>> vs. in 251053 should be different; and that file have been re-built
> >>> when coming back to 251045 as well.
> >>>
> >>> -- Sanjoy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Sanjoy Das
> >>> <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
> >>>> Thanks Galina,  this should help me discover the first breaking
> >>>> revision quickly.
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Sanjoy
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Galina Kistanova <
> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>PS: I noticed the `Force build` form, but wasn't sure if I was okay
> >>>>> using it
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's ok. Please fill "Branch to build" and "Revision to build:"
> fields.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Galina
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Sanjoy Das <
> sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have not been able to reproduce this issue on a Release without
> >>>>>> asserts bootstrap on OSX or Linux.  I'm trying a Release+Asserts
> >>>>>> bootstrap now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since I don't have access to a Windows box, some help on narrowing
> >>>>>> down the issue will be much appreciated.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For instance, is it possible to build and test each of the revisions
> >>>>>> between r251045 and r251053?  Narrowing down the failure to one
> >>>>>> revision will be very helpful.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PS: I noticed the `Force build` form, but wasn't sure if I was okay
> >>>>>> using it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Sanjoy
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org wrote:
> >>>>>> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
> clang-x64-ninja-win7
> >>>>>> > while building llvm.
> >>>>>> > Full details are available at:
> >>>>>> >
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/6404
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Buildslave for this Build: windows7-buildbot
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Build Reason: scheduler
> >>>>>> > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 251053
> >>>>>> > Blamelist: sanjoy
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > BUILD FAILED: failed ninja check 2
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > sincerely,
> >>>>>> >   -The Buildbot
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sanjoy Das
> >>>> http://playingwithpointers.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sanjoy Das
> >>> http://playingwithpointers.com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> llvm-commits mailing list
> >>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sanjoy Das
> > http://playingwithpointers.com
>
>
>
> --
> Sanjoy Das
> http://playingwithpointers.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151023/1060ac67/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list