[llvm] r249211 - [SCEV] Recognize simple br-phi patterns
Sanjoy Das via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 2 16:09:44 PDT 2015
Author: sanjoy
Date: Fri Oct 2 18:09:44 2015
New Revision: 249211
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=249211&view=rev
Log:
[SCEV] Recognize simple br-phi patterns
Summary:
Teach SCEV to match patterns like
```
br %cond, label %left, label %right
left:
br label %merge
right:
br label %merge
merge:
V = phi [ %x, %left ], [ %y, %right ]
```
as "select %cond, %x, %y". Before this SCEV would match PHI nodes
exclusively to add recurrences.
This addresses PR25005.
Reviewers: joker.eph, joker-eph, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13378
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/smax-br-phi-idioms.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h?rev=249211&r1=249210&r2=249211&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h Fri Oct 2 18:09:44 2015
@@ -415,12 +415,18 @@ namespace llvm {
/// Provide the special handling we need to analyze PHI SCEVs.
const SCEV *createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN);
+ /// Helper function called from createNodeForPHI.
+ const SCEV *createAddRecFromPHI(PHINode *PN);
+
+ /// Helper function called from createNodeForPHI.
+ const SCEV *createNodeFromSelectLikePHI(PHINode *PN);
+
/// Provide special handling for a select-like instruction (currently this
/// is either a select instruction or a phi node). \p I is the instruction
/// being processed, and it is assumed equivalent to "Cond ? TrueVal :
/// FalseVal".
- const SCEV *createNodeForSelect(Instruction *I, Value *Cond, Value *TrueVal,
- Value *FalseVal);
+ const SCEV *createNodeForSelectOrPHI(Instruction *I, Value *Cond,
+ Value *TrueVal, Value *FalseVal);
/// Provide the special handling we need to analyze GEP SCEVs.
const SCEV *createNodeForGEP(GEPOperator *GEP);
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=249211&r1=249210&r2=249211&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Fri Oct 2 18:09:44 2015
@@ -3597,151 +3597,293 @@ ScalarEvolution::ForgetSymbolicName(Inst
}
}
-/// createNodeForPHI - PHI nodes have two cases. Either the PHI node exists in
-/// a loop header, making it a potential recurrence, or it doesn't.
-///
-const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
- if (const Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(PN->getParent()))
- if (L->getHeader() == PN->getParent()) {
- // The loop may have multiple entrances or multiple exits; we can analyze
- // this phi as an addrec if it has a unique entry value and a unique
- // backedge value.
- Value *BEValueV = nullptr, *StartValueV = nullptr;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
- Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
- if (L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) {
- if (!BEValueV) {
- BEValueV = V;
- } else if (BEValueV != V) {
- BEValueV = nullptr;
+const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHI(PHINode *PN) {
+ const Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(PN->getParent());
+ if (!L || L->getHeader() != PN->getParent())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // The loop may have multiple entrances or multiple exits; we can analyze
+ // this phi as an addrec if it has a unique entry value and a unique
+ // backedge value.
+ Value *BEValueV = nullptr, *StartValueV = nullptr;
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
+ Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
+ if (L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) {
+ if (!BEValueV) {
+ BEValueV = V;
+ } else if (BEValueV != V) {
+ BEValueV = nullptr;
+ break;
+ }
+ } else if (!StartValueV) {
+ StartValueV = V;
+ } else if (StartValueV != V) {
+ StartValueV = nullptr;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (BEValueV && StartValueV) {
+ // While we are analyzing this PHI node, handle its value symbolically.
+ const SCEV *SymbolicName = getUnknown(PN);
+ assert(ValueExprMap.find_as(PN) == ValueExprMap.end() &&
+ "PHI node already processed?");
+ ValueExprMap.insert(std::make_pair(SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this), SymbolicName));
+
+ // Using this symbolic name for the PHI, analyze the value coming around
+ // the back-edge.
+ const SCEV *BEValue = getSCEV(BEValueV);
+
+ // NOTE: If BEValue is loop invariant, we know that the PHI node just
+ // has a special value for the first iteration of the loop.
+
+ // If the value coming around the backedge is an add with the symbolic
+ // value we just inserted, then we found a simple induction variable!
+ if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(BEValue)) {
+ // If there is a single occurrence of the symbolic value, replace it
+ // with a recurrence.
+ unsigned FoundIndex = Add->getNumOperands();
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Add->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
+ if (Add->getOperand(i) == SymbolicName)
+ if (FoundIndex == e) {
+ FoundIndex = i;
break;
}
- } else if (!StartValueV) {
- StartValueV = V;
- } else if (StartValueV != V) {
- StartValueV = nullptr;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (BEValueV && StartValueV) {
- // While we are analyzing this PHI node, handle its value symbolically.
- const SCEV *SymbolicName = getUnknown(PN);
- assert(ValueExprMap.find_as(PN) == ValueExprMap.end() &&
- "PHI node already processed?");
- ValueExprMap.insert(std::make_pair(SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this), SymbolicName));
-
- // Using this symbolic name for the PHI, analyze the value coming around
- // the back-edge.
- const SCEV *BEValue = getSCEV(BEValueV);
-
- // NOTE: If BEValue is loop invariant, we know that the PHI node just
- // has a special value for the first iteration of the loop.
-
- // If the value coming around the backedge is an add with the symbolic
- // value we just inserted, then we found a simple induction variable!
- if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(BEValue)) {
- // If there is a single occurrence of the symbolic value, replace it
- // with a recurrence.
- unsigned FoundIndex = Add->getNumOperands();
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = Add->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
- if (Add->getOperand(i) == SymbolicName)
- if (FoundIndex == e) {
- FoundIndex = i;
- break;
- }
-
- if (FoundIndex != Add->getNumOperands()) {
- // Create an add with everything but the specified operand.
- SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = Add->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
- if (i != FoundIndex)
- Ops.push_back(Add->getOperand(i));
- const SCEV *Accum = getAddExpr(Ops);
-
- // This is not a valid addrec if the step amount is varying each
- // loop iteration, but is not itself an addrec in this loop.
- if (isLoopInvariant(Accum, L) ||
- (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Accum) &&
- cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Accum)->getLoop() == L)) {
- SCEV::NoWrapFlags Flags = SCEV::FlagAnyWrap;
-
- // If the increment doesn't overflow, then neither the addrec nor
- // the post-increment will overflow.
- if (const AddOperator *OBO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(BEValueV)) {
- if (OBO->getOperand(0) == PN) {
- if (OBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
- Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNUW);
- if (OBO->hasNoSignedWrap())
- Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNSW);
- }
- } else if (GEPOperator *GEP = dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(BEValueV)) {
- // If the increment is an inbounds GEP, then we know the address
- // space cannot be wrapped around. We cannot make any guarantee
- // about signed or unsigned overflow because pointers are
- // unsigned but we may have a negative index from the base
- // pointer. We can guarantee that no unsigned wrap occurs if the
- // indices form a positive value.
- if (GEP->isInBounds() && GEP->getOperand(0) == PN) {
- Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNW);
-
- const SCEV *Ptr = getSCEV(GEP->getPointerOperand());
- if (isKnownPositive(getMinusSCEV(getSCEV(GEP), Ptr)))
- Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNUW);
- }
-
- // We cannot transfer nuw and nsw flags from subtraction
- // operations -- sub nuw X, Y is not the same as add nuw X, -Y
- // for instance.
- }
-
- const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
- const SCEV *PHISCEV = getAddRecExpr(StartVal, Accum, L, Flags);
-
- // Since the no-wrap flags are on the increment, they apply to the
- // post-incremented value as well.
- if (isLoopInvariant(Accum, L))
- (void)getAddRecExpr(getAddExpr(StartVal, Accum),
- Accum, L, Flags);
-
- // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
- // to be symbolic. We now need to go back and purge all of the
- // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
- ForgetSymbolicName(PN, SymbolicName);
- ValueExprMap[SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this)] = PHISCEV;
- return PHISCEV;
+
+ if (FoundIndex != Add->getNumOperands()) {
+ // Create an add with everything but the specified operand.
+ SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Add->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
+ if (i != FoundIndex)
+ Ops.push_back(Add->getOperand(i));
+ const SCEV *Accum = getAddExpr(Ops);
+
+ // This is not a valid addrec if the step amount is varying each
+ // loop iteration, but is not itself an addrec in this loop.
+ if (isLoopInvariant(Accum, L) ||
+ (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Accum) &&
+ cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Accum)->getLoop() == L)) {
+ SCEV::NoWrapFlags Flags = SCEV::FlagAnyWrap;
+
+ // If the increment doesn't overflow, then neither the addrec nor
+ // the post-increment will overflow.
+ if (const AddOperator *OBO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(BEValueV)) {
+ if (OBO->getOperand(0) == PN) {
+ if (OBO->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
+ Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNUW);
+ if (OBO->hasNoSignedWrap())
+ Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNSW);
}
- }
- } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec =
- dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(BEValue)) {
- // Otherwise, this could be a loop like this:
- // i = 0; for (j = 1; ..; ++j) { .... i = j; }
- // In this case, j = {1,+,1} and BEValue is j.
- // Because the other in-value of i (0) fits the evolution of BEValue
- // i really is an addrec evolution.
- if (AddRec->getLoop() == L && AddRec->isAffine()) {
- const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
-
- // If StartVal = j.start - j.stride, we can use StartVal as the
- // initial step of the addrec evolution.
- if (StartVal == getMinusSCEV(AddRec->getOperand(0),
- AddRec->getOperand(1))) {
- // FIXME: For constant StartVal, we should be able to infer
- // no-wrap flags.
- const SCEV *PHISCEV =
- getAddRecExpr(StartVal, AddRec->getOperand(1), L,
- SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
-
- // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
- // to be symbolic. We now need to go back and purge all of the
- // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
- ForgetSymbolicName(PN, SymbolicName);
- ValueExprMap[SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this)] = PHISCEV;
- return PHISCEV;
+ } else if (GEPOperator *GEP = dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(BEValueV)) {
+ // If the increment is an inbounds GEP, then we know the address
+ // space cannot be wrapped around. We cannot make any guarantee
+ // about signed or unsigned overflow because pointers are
+ // unsigned but we may have a negative index from the base
+ // pointer. We can guarantee that no unsigned wrap occurs if the
+ // indices form a positive value.
+ if (GEP->isInBounds() && GEP->getOperand(0) == PN) {
+ Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNW);
+
+ const SCEV *Ptr = getSCEV(GEP->getPointerOperand());
+ if (isKnownPositive(getMinusSCEV(getSCEV(GEP), Ptr)))
+ Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNUW);
}
+
+ // We cannot transfer nuw and nsw flags from subtraction
+ // operations -- sub nuw X, Y is not the same as add nuw X, -Y
+ // for instance.
}
+
+ const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
+ const SCEV *PHISCEV = getAddRecExpr(StartVal, Accum, L, Flags);
+
+ // Since the no-wrap flags are on the increment, they apply to the
+ // post-incremented value as well.
+ if (isLoopInvariant(Accum, L))
+ (void)getAddRecExpr(getAddExpr(StartVal, Accum), Accum, L, Flags);
+
+ // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
+ // to be symbolic. We now need to go back and purge all of the
+ // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
+ ForgetSymbolicName(PN, SymbolicName);
+ ValueExprMap[SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this)] = PHISCEV;
+ return PHISCEV;
+ }
+ }
+ } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec =
+ dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(BEValue)) {
+ // Otherwise, this could be a loop like this:
+ // i = 0; for (j = 1; ..; ++j) { .... i = j; }
+ // In this case, j = {1,+,1} and BEValue is j.
+ // Because the other in-value of i (0) fits the evolution of BEValue
+ // i really is an addrec evolution.
+ if (AddRec->getLoop() == L && AddRec->isAffine()) {
+ const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
+
+ // If StartVal = j.start - j.stride, we can use StartVal as the
+ // initial step of the addrec evolution.
+ if (StartVal ==
+ getMinusSCEV(AddRec->getOperand(0), AddRec->getOperand(1))) {
+ // FIXME: For constant StartVal, we should be able to infer
+ // no-wrap flags.
+ const SCEV *PHISCEV = getAddRecExpr(StartVal, AddRec->getOperand(1),
+ L, SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
+
+ // Okay, for the entire analysis of this edge we assumed the PHI
+ // to be symbolic. We now need to go back and purge all of the
+ // entries for the scalars that use the symbolic expression.
+ ForgetSymbolicName(PN, SymbolicName);
+ ValueExprMap[SCEVCallbackVH(PN, this)] = PHISCEV;
+ return PHISCEV;
}
}
}
+ }
+
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeFromSelectLikePHI(PHINode *PN) {
+ const Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(PN->getParent());
+
+ // Try to match a control flow sequence that branches out at BI and merges
+ // back at Merge into a "C ? LHS : RHS" select pattern. Return true on a
+ // successful match.
+ auto BrPHIToSelect = [&](BranchInst *BI, PHINode *Merge, Value *&C,
+ Value *&LHS, Value *&RHS) {
+ C = BI->getCondition();
+
+ BasicBlockEdge LeftEdge(BI->getParent(), BI->getSuccessor(0));
+ BasicBlockEdge RightEdge(BI->getParent(), BI->getSuccessor(1));
+
+ if (!LeftEdge.isSingleEdge())
+ return false;
+
+ assert(RightEdge.isSingleEdge() && "Follows from LeftEdge.isSingleEdge()");
+
+ Use &LeftUse = Merge->getOperandUse(0);
+ Use &RightUse = Merge->getOperandUse(1);
+
+ if (DT.dominates(LeftEdge, LeftUse) && DT.dominates(RightEdge, RightUse)) {
+ LHS = LeftUse;
+ RHS = RightUse;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ if (DT.dominates(LeftEdge, RightUse) && DT.dominates(RightEdge, LeftUse)) {
+ LHS = RightUse;
+ RHS = LeftUse;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+ };
+
+ // Checks if the SCEV S is available at BB. S is considered available at BB
+ // if S can be materialized at BB without introducing a fault.
+ auto IsAvailableOnEntry = [&](const SCEV *S, BasicBlock *BB) {
+ struct CheckAvailable {
+ bool TraversalDone = false;
+ bool Available = true;
+
+ const Loop *L = nullptr; // The loop BB is in (can be nullptr)
+ BasicBlock *BB = nullptr;
+ DominatorTree &DT;
+
+ CheckAvailable(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *BB, DominatorTree &DT)
+ : L(L), BB(BB), DT(DT) {}
+
+ bool setUnavailable() {
+ TraversalDone = true;
+ Available = false;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ bool follow(const SCEV *S) {
+ switch (S->getSCEVType()) {
+ case scConstant: case scTruncate: case scZeroExtend: case scSignExtend:
+ case scAddExpr: case scMulExpr: case scUMaxExpr: case scSMaxExpr:
+ // These expressions are available if their operand(s) is/are.
+ return true;
+
+ case scAddRecExpr: {
+ // We allow add recurrences that are on the loop BB is in, or some
+ // outer loop. This guarantees availability because the value of the
+ // add recurrence at BB is simply the "current" value of the induction
+ // variable. We can relax this in the future; for instance an add
+ // recurrence on a sibling dominating loop is also available at BB.
+ const auto *ARLoop = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getLoop();
+ if (L && (ARLoop == L || ARLoop->contains(L)))
+ return true;
+
+ return setUnavailable();
+ }
+
+ case scUnknown: {
+ // For SCEVUnknown, we check for simple dominance.
+ const auto *SU = cast<SCEVUnknown>(S);
+ Value *V = SU->getValue();
+
+ if (isa<Argument>(V))
+ return false;
+
+ if (isa<Instruction>(V) && DT.dominates(cast<Instruction>(V), BB))
+ return false;
+
+ return setUnavailable();
+ }
+
+ case scUDivExpr:
+ case scCouldNotCompute:
+ // We do not try to smart about these at all.
+ return setUnavailable();
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("switch should be fully covered!");
+ }
+
+ bool isDone() { return TraversalDone; }
+ };
+
+ CheckAvailable CA(L, BB, DT);
+ SCEVTraversal<CheckAvailable> ST(CA);
+
+ ST.visitAll(S);
+ return CA.Available;
+ };
+
+ if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2) {
+ // Try to match
+ //
+ // br %cond, label %left, label %right
+ // left:
+ // br label %merge
+ // right:
+ // br label %merge
+ // merge:
+ // V = phi [ %x, %left ], [ %y, %right ]
+ //
+ // as "select %cond, %x, %y"
+
+ BasicBlock *IDom = DT[PN->getParent()]->getIDom()->getBlock();
+ assert(IDom && "At least the entry block should dominate PN");
+
+ auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(IDom->getTerminator());
+ Value *Cond = nullptr, *LHS = nullptr, *RHS = nullptr;
+
+ if (BI && BI->isConditional() && BrPHIToSelect(BI, PN, Cond, LHS, RHS) &&
+ IsAvailableOnEntry(getSCEV(LHS), PN->getParent()) &&
+ IsAvailableOnEntry(getSCEV(RHS), PN->getParent()))
+ return createNodeForSelectOrPHI(PN, Cond, LHS, RHS);
+ }
+
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
+ if (const SCEV *S = createAddRecFromPHI(PN))
+ return S;
+
+ if (const SCEV *S = createNodeFromSelectLikePHI(PN))
+ return S;
// If the PHI has a single incoming value, follow that value, unless the
// PHI's incoming blocks are in a different loop, in which case doing so
@@ -3756,9 +3898,10 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeF
return getUnknown(PN);
}
-const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForSelect(Instruction *I, Value *Cond,
- Value *TrueVal,
- Value *FalseVal) {
+const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForSelectOrPHI(Instruction *I,
+ Value *Cond,
+ Value *TrueVal,
+ Value *FalseVal) {
// Try to match some simple smax or umax patterns.
auto *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Cond);
if (!ICI)
@@ -4568,8 +4711,8 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createSCEV(
// constant expressions cannot have instructions as operands, we'd have
// returned getUnknown for a select constant expressions anyway.
if (isa<Instruction>(U))
- return createNodeForSelect(cast<Instruction>(U), U->getOperand(0),
- U->getOperand(1), U->getOperand(2));
+ return createNodeForSelectOrPHI(cast<Instruction>(U), U->getOperand(0),
+ U->getOperand(1), U->getOperand(2));
default: // We cannot analyze this expression.
break;
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/smax-br-phi-idioms.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/smax-br-phi-idioms.ll?rev=249211&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/smax-br-phi-idioms.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/smax-br-phi-idioms.ll Fri Oct 2 18:09:44 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+; RUN: opt -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define i32 @f0(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f0
+ entry:
+ %c = icmp sgt i32 %y, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %add, label %merge
+
+ add:
+ %sum = add i32 %x, %y
+ br label %merge
+
+ merge:
+ %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK: %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((0 smax %y) + %x) U: full-set S: full-set
+ ret i32 %v
+}
+
+define i32 @f1(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f1
+ entry:
+ %c = icmp sge i32 %y, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %add, label %merge
+
+ add:
+ %sum = add i32 %x, %y
+ br label %merge
+
+ merge:
+ %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK: %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((0 smax %y) + %x) U: full-set S: full-set
+ ret i32 %v
+}
+
+define i32 @f2(i32 %x, i32 %y, i32* %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f2
+ entry:
+ %c = icmp sge i32 %y, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %add, label %merge
+
+ add:
+ %lv = load i32, i32* %ptr
+ br label %merge
+
+ merge:
+ %v = phi i32 [ %lv, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK: %v = phi i32 [ %lv, %add ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> %v U: full-set S: full-set
+ ret i32 %v
+}
+
+define i32 @f3(i32 %x, i32 %init, i32 %lim) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f3
+ entry:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %iv = phi i32 [ %init, %entry ], [ %iv.inc, %merge ]
+ %iv.inc = add i32 %iv, 1
+ %c = icmp sge i32 %iv, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %add, label %merge
+
+ add:
+ %sum = add i32 %x, %iv
+ br label %merge
+
+ merge:
+ %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %loop ]
+; CHECK: %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add ], [ %x, %loop ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((0 smax {%init,+,1}<%loop>) + %x) U: full-set S: full-set
+ %be.cond = icmp eq i32 %iv.inc, %lim
+ br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
+
+ leave:
+ ret i32 0
+}
+
+define i32 @f4(i32 %x, i32 %init, i32 %lim) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f4
+ entry:
+ %c = icmp sge i32 %init, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %add, label %merge
+
+ add:
+ br label %loop
+
+ loop:
+ %iv = phi i32 [ %init, %add ], [ %iv.inc, %loop ]
+ %iv.inc = add i32 %iv, 1
+ %be.cond = icmp eq i32 %iv.inc, %lim
+ br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %add.cont
+
+ add.cont:
+ %sum = add i32 %x, %iv
+ br label %merge
+
+ merge:
+ %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add.cont ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK: %v = phi i32 [ %sum, %add.cont ], [ %x, %entry ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> %v U: full-set S: full-set
+ ret i32 %v
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list