[PATCH] D12142: [PM/AA] Flesh out statistics to cover all the primary use cases of the old AliasAnalysisCounter pass.

[Chandler Carruth via llvm-commits]

I'm OK working on doing that (I actually started there), but it looked like
I'd need to do a fair amount of work and it will slow me down... How badly
do you want this now, and how much do you want to put it on my critical
path to moving forward? I don't have strong opinions here, I'm jsut looking
for the fastest way to make forward progress.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM hfinkel at anl.gov via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> hfinkel added a subscriber: hfinkel.
> hfinkel added a comment.
>
> It seems unfortunate to need to make the AA result statistics essentially
> part of the boilerplate necessary to implement a good AA provider. Can we
> move all statistics generation into the aggregrator? We don't need to use
> the STATISTIC macro, really, the aggregrator can construct a set of such
> objects based on the names of the underlying providers in its care, and
> then use them as it iterates up the chain.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12142
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150828/25d8e347/attachment.html>