[PATCH] D12006: [X86][SSE] Use the general SMAX/SMIN/UMAX/UMIN pattern matching and remove the X86 implementation

[Quentin Colombet via llvm-commits]

qcolombet added a comment.

Hi Simon,

Just asking, since I haven’t followed the previous related patches: Aren’t we regressing AVX512 by removing matchIntegerMINMAX?
More generally, does the generic code produce as many MIN/MAX patterns as this target specific one?

Thanks,
-Quentin


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D12006