[llvm] r244485 - Modify diagnostic messages to clearly indicate the why interleaving wasn't done.

Tyler Nowicki via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 10 12:14:17 PDT 2015


Author: tnowicki
Date: Mon Aug 10 14:14:16 2015
New Revision: 244485

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=244485&view=rev
Log:
Modify diagnostic messages to clearly indicate the why interleaving wasn't done.

Sometimes interleaving is not beneficial, as determined by the cost-model and sometimes it is disabled by a loop hint (by the user). This patch modifies the diagnostic messages to make it clear why interleaving wasn't done.

Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-profitable.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-missed.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp?rev=244485&r1=244484&r2=244485&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp Mon Aug 10 14:14:16 2015
@@ -1577,11 +1577,17 @@ struct LoopVectorize : public FunctionPa
     }
 
     if (Hints.getWidth() == 1 && Hints.getInterleave() == 1) {
+      // FIXME: Add a separate metadata to indicate when the loop has already
+      // been vectorized instead of setting width and count to 1.
       DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Not vectorizing: Disabled/already vectorized.\n");
+      // FIXME: Add interleave.disable metadata. This will allow
+      // vectorize.disable to be used without disabling the pass and errors
+      // to differentiate between disabled vectorization and a width of 1.
       emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(
           F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F, L->getStartLoc(),
-          "loop not vectorized: vector width and interleave count are "
-          "explicitly set to 1");
+          "loop not vectorized: vectorization and interleaving are explicitly "
+          "disabled, or vectorize width and interleave count are both set to "
+          "1");
       return false;
     }
 
@@ -1652,28 +1658,74 @@ struct LoopVectorize : public FunctionPa
     // Select the interleave count.
     unsigned IC = CM.selectInterleaveCount(OptForSize, VF.Width, VF.Cost);
 
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found a vectorizable loop (" << VF.Width << ") in "
-                 << DebugLocStr << '\n');
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleave Count is " << IC << '\n');
+    // Get user interleave count.
+    unsigned UserIC = Hints.getInterleave();
 
-    if (VF.Width == 1) {
-      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Vectorization is possible but not beneficial\n");
-
-      if (IC == 1) {
-        emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(
-            F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F, L->getStartLoc(),
-            "not beneficial to vectorize and user disabled interleaving");
-        return false;
-      }
-      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Trying to at least unroll the loops.\n");
-
-      // Report the unrolling decision.
-      emitOptimizationRemark(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F, L->getStartLoc(),
-                             Twine("interleaved by " + Twine(IC) +
-                                   " (vectorization not beneficial)"));
+    // Identify the diagnostic messages that should be produced.
+    std::string VecDiagMsg, IntDiagMsg;
+    bool VectorizeLoop = true, InterleaveLoop = true;
 
+    if (VF.Width == 1) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Vectorization is possible but not beneficial.\n");
+      VecDiagMsg =
+          "the cost-model indicates that vectorization is not beneficial";
+      VectorizeLoop = false;
+    }
+
+    if (IC == 1 && UserIC <= 1) {
+      // Tell the user interleaving is not beneficial.
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleaving is not beneficial.\n");
+      IntDiagMsg =
+          "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is not beneficial";
+      InterleaveLoop = false;
+      if (UserIC == 1)
+        IntDiagMsg +=
+            " and is explicitly disabled or interleave count is set to 1";
+    } else if (IC > 1 && UserIC == 1) {
+      // Tell the user interleaving is beneficial, but it explicitly disabled.
+      DEBUG(dbgs()
+            << "LV: Interleaving is beneficial but is explicitly disabled.");
+      IntDiagMsg = "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is beneficial "
+                   "but is explicitly disabled or interleave count is set to 1";
+      InterleaveLoop = false;
+    }
+
+    // Override IC if user provided an interleave count.
+    IC = UserIC > 0 ? UserIC : IC;
+
+    // Emit diagnostic messages, if any.
+    if (!VectorizeLoop && !InterleaveLoop) {
+      // Do not vectorize or interleaving the loop.
+      emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F,
+                                     L->getStartLoc(), VecDiagMsg);
+      emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F,
+                                     L->getStartLoc(), IntDiagMsg);
+      return false;
+    } else if (!VectorizeLoop && InterleaveLoop) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleave Count is " << IC << '\n');
+      emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F,
+                                     L->getStartLoc(), VecDiagMsg);
+    } else if (VectorizeLoop && !InterleaveLoop) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found a vectorizable loop (" << VF.Width << ") in "
+                   << DebugLocStr << '\n');
+      emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F,
+                                     L->getStartLoc(), IntDiagMsg);
+    } else if (VectorizeLoop && InterleaveLoop) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found a vectorizable loop (" << VF.Width << ") in "
+                   << DebugLocStr << '\n');
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleave Count is " << IC << '\n');
+    }
+
+    if (!VectorizeLoop) {
+      assert(IC > 1 && "interleave count should not be 1 or 0");
+      // If we decided that it is not legal to vectorize the loop then
+      // interleave it.
       InnerLoopUnroller Unroller(L, SE, LI, DT, TLI, TTI, IC);
       Unroller.vectorize(&LVL);
+
+      emitOptimizationRemark(F->getContext(), DEBUG_TYPE, *F, L->getStartLoc(),
+                             Twine("interleaved loop (interleaved count: ") +
+                                 Twine(IC) + ")");
     } else {
       // If we decided that it is *legal* to vectorize the loop then do it.
       InnerLoopVectorizer LB(L, SE, LI, DT, TLI, TTI, VF.Width, IC);
@@ -4635,11 +4687,6 @@ unsigned LoopVectorizationCostModel::sel
   // 3. We don't interleave if we think that we will spill registers to memory
   // due to the increased register pressure.
 
-  // Use the user preference, unless 'auto' is selected.
-  int UserUF = Hints->getInterleave();
-  if (UserUF != 0)
-    return UserUF;
-
   // When we optimize for size, we don't interleave.
   if (OptForSize)
     return 1;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-missed.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-missed.ll?rev=244485&r1=244484&r2=244485&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-missed.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-missed.ll Mon Aug 10 14:14:16 2015
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 ; File, line, and column should match those specified in the metadata
 ; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:4:5: loop not vectorized: could not determine number of loop iterations
 ; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:4:5: loop not vectorized: use -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize for more info
-; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:13:5: loop not vectorized: vector width and interleave count are explicitly set to 1
+; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:13:5: loop not vectorized: vectorization and interleaving are explicitly disabled, or vectorize width and interleave count are both set to 1
 ; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:19:5: loop not vectorized: cannot identify array bounds
 ; CHECK: remark: source.cpp:19:5: loop not vectorized: use -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize for more info
 ; CHECK: warning: source.cpp:19:5: loop not vectorized: failed explicitly specified loop vectorization

Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-profitable.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-profitable.ll?rev=244485&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-profitable.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks-profitable.ll Mon Aug 10 14:14:16 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -pass-remarks-analysis='loop-vectorize' -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux -S 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; Verify analysis remarks are generated when interleaving is not beneficial.
+; CHECK: remark: vectorization-remarks-profitable.c:4:14: the cost-model indicates that vectorization is not beneficial
+; CHECK: remark: vectorization-remarks-profitable.c:4:14: the cost-model indicates that interleaving is not beneficial and is explicitly disabled or interleave count is set to 1
+; CHECK: remark: vectorization-remarks-profitable.c:11:14: the cost-model indicates that vectorization is not beneficial
+; CHECK: remark: vectorization-remarks-profitable.c:11:14: the cost-model indicates that interleaving is not beneficial
+
+; First loop.
+;  #pragma clang loop interleave(disable) unroll(disable)
+;  for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+;    out[i] = in[i];
+;  }
+
+; Second loop.
+;  #pragma clang loop unroll(disable)
+;  for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+;    out[i] = in[i];
+;  }
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.10.0"
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define void @do_not_interleave(float* nocapture %out, float* nocapture readonly %in, i32 %n) #0 {
+entry:
+  %cmp.7 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0, !dbg !3
+  br i1 %cmp.7, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup, !dbg !8
+
+for.body.preheader:                               ; preds = %entry
+  br label %for.body, !dbg !9
+
+for.cond.cleanup.loopexit:                        ; preds = %for.body
+  br label %for.cond.cleanup, !dbg !10
+
+for.cond.cleanup:                                 ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup.loopexit, %entry
+  ret void, !dbg !10
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %in, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !9
+  %0 = bitcast float* %arrayidx to i32*, !dbg !9
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !9, !tbaa !11
+  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %out, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !15
+  %2 = bitcast float* %arrayidx2 to i32*, !dbg !16
+  store i32 %1, i32* %2, align 4, !dbg !16, !tbaa !11
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1, !dbg !8
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32, !dbg !8
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n, !dbg !8
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.cleanup.loopexit, label %for.body, !dbg !8, !llvm.loop !17
+}
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define void @interleave_not_profitable(float* nocapture %out, float* nocapture readonly %in, i32 %n) #0 {
+entry:
+  %cmp.7 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0, !dbg !20
+  br i1 %cmp.7, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup, !dbg !22
+
+for.body.preheader:                               ; preds = %entry
+  br label %for.body, !dbg !23
+
+for.cond.cleanup.loopexit:                        ; preds = %for.body
+  br label %for.cond.cleanup, !dbg !24
+
+for.cond.cleanup:                                 ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup.loopexit, %entry
+  ret void, !dbg !24
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %in, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !23
+  %0 = bitcast float* %arrayidx to i32*, !dbg !23
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !23, !tbaa !11
+  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %out, i64 %indvars.iv, !dbg !25
+  %2 = bitcast float* %arrayidx2 to i32*, !dbg !26
+  store i32 %1, i32* %2, align 4, !dbg !26, !tbaa !11
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1, !dbg !22
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32, !dbg !22
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n, !dbg !22
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.cleanup.loopexit, label %for.body, !dbg !22, !llvm.loop !27
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { nounwind }
+
+!llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1}
+!llvm.ident = !{!2}
+
+!0 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
+!1 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
+!2 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0"}
+!3 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 20, scope: !4)
+!4 = !DISubprogram(name: "do_not_interleave", scope: !5, file: !5, line: 1, type: !6, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: true, function: void (float*, float*, i32)* @do_not_interleave, variables: !7)
+!5 = !DIFile(filename: "vectorization-remarks-profitable.c", directory: "")
+!6 = !DISubroutineType(types: !7)
+!7 = !{}
+!8 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 3, scope: !4)
+!9 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 14, scope: !4)
+!10 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 1, scope: !4)
+!11 = !{!12, !12, i64 0}
+!12 = !{!"float", !13, i64 0}
+!13 = !{!"omnipotent char", !14, i64 0}
+!14 = !{!"Simple C/C++ TBAA"}
+!15 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 5, scope: !4)
+!16 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 12, scope: !4)
+!17 = distinct !{!17, !18, !19}
+!18 = !{!"llvm.loop.interleave.count", i32 1}
+!19 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll.disable"}
+!20 = !DILocation(line: 10, column: 20, scope: !21)
+!21 = !DISubprogram(name: "interleave_not_profitable", scope: !5, file: !5, line: 8, type: !6, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 8, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: true, function: void (float*, float*, i32)* @interleave_not_profitable, variables: !7)
+!22 = !DILocation(line: 10, column: 3, scope: !21)
+!23 = !DILocation(line: 11, column: 14, scope: !21)
+!24 = !DILocation(line: 13, column: 1, scope: !21)
+!25 = !DILocation(line: 11, column: 5, scope: !21)
+!26 = !DILocation(line: 11, column: 12, scope: !21)
+!27 = distinct !{!27, !19}

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks.ll?rev=244485&r1=244484&r2=244485&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vectorization-remarks.ll Mon Aug 10 14:14:16 2015
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
 ; DEBUG-OUTPUT-NOT: .loc
 ; DEBUG-OUTPUT-NOT: {{.*}}.debug_info
 
-; NONE: remark: vectorization-remarks.c:17:8: loop not vectorized: vector width and interleave count are explicitly set to 1
 ; VECTORIZED: remark: vectorization-remarks.c:17:8: vectorized loop (vectorization width: 4, interleaved count: 1)
-; UNROLLED: remark: vectorization-remarks.c:17:8: interleaved by 4 (vectorization not beneficial)
+; UNROLLED: remark: vectorization-remarks.c:17:8: interleaved loop (interleaved count: 4)
+; NONE: remark: vectorization-remarks.c:17:8: loop not vectorized: vectorization and interleaving are explicitly disabled, or vectorize width and interleave count are both set to 1
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list