[llvm] r242451 - [SCEV][NFC] Use triple-slash (///) for comment.

[Sanjoy Das]

Author: sanjoy
Date: Thu Jul 16 17:08:37 2015
New Revision: 242451

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=242451&view=rev
Log:
[SCEV][NFC] Use triple-slash (///) for comment.

Makes the comments for proveNoWrapByVaryingStart consistent with the
rest of ScalarEvolution.h

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h?rev=242451&r1=242450&r2=242451&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h Thu Jul 16 17:08:37 2015
@@ -569,11 +569,12 @@ namespace llvm {
     /// pointer.
     bool checkValidity(const SCEV *S) const;
 
-    // Return true if `ExtendOpTy`({`Start`,+,`Step`}) can be proved to be equal
-    // to {`ExtendOpTy`(`Start`),+,`ExtendOpTy`(`Step`)}.  This is equivalent to
-    // proving no signed (resp. unsigned) wrap in {`Start`,+,`Step`} if
-    // `ExtendOpTy` is `SCEVSignExtendExpr` (resp. `SCEVZeroExtendExpr`).
-    //
+    /// Return true if `ExtendOpTy`({`Start`,+,`Step`}) can be proved to be
+    /// equal to {`ExtendOpTy`(`Start`),+,`ExtendOpTy`(`Step`)}.  This is
+    /// equivalent to proving no signed (resp. unsigned) wrap in
+    /// {`Start`,+,`Step`} if `ExtendOpTy` is `SCEVSignExtendExpr`
+    /// (resp. `SCEVZeroExtendExpr`).
+    ///
     template<typename ExtendOpTy>
     bool proveNoWrapByVaryingStart(const SCEV *Start, const SCEV *Step,
                                    const Loop *L);