[PATCH] [comiler-rt/ubsan] getVtablePrefix must not sanity-check on Prefix->Offset > 0

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Jul 13 23:45:22 PDT 2015


ping^7

It would be great if somebody could get this patch pushed.  (It unbreaks 
UBSan builds of LibreOffice, and it is somewhat painful to maintain as a 
local patch on all the machines I use for such builds.)

I updated the attached getVtablesPrefix.patch to current trunk, and also 
added the test case from my original mail to it now.

Thanks,
Stephan

On 07/03/2015 09:22 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> ping^6
>
> On 06/26/2015 08:57 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> ping1^5
>>
>> On 06/19/2015 02:02 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> ping^4
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2015 07:06 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     I referred to David Majnemer, who touched this code a while ago.
>>>> But
>>>>     thanks for suggesting help :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, +Majnemer.
>>>>
>>>> - Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Alexey Samsonov
>>>>         <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Richard or David, do you want to look into this, or you'd
>>>>             prefer to leave this for me?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         I can't say I have much more context in vtable layout & C++ ABI
>>>>         than you do, most likely. Happy to bounce some the ideas around
>>>>         in person if that's helpful.
>>>>
>>>>         - David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Stephan Bergmann
>>>>             <sbergman at redhat.com <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 ping^3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On 12/16/2014 10:52 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     ping
>>>>                     On 12/05/2014 09:33 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         ping
>>>>                         On 08/12/2014 09:10 PM, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                             +Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                             On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Stephan
>>>>                             Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                  On 08/11/2014 10:19 PM, Alexey
>>>> Samsonov
>>>>                             wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                      +Richard
>>>>
>>>>                                      Note, that you'd also have to
>>>>                             update comment for
>>>>                                      VtablePrefix::Offset field.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                  ah, right; updated patch
>>>>
>>>>                                  Stephan
>>>>
>>>>                                      On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:30 AM,
>>>>                             Stephan Bergmann
>>>>                                      <sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>>
>>>>                                      <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com
>>>>                             <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>>>>
>>>>                             wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                           At least with recent Clang
>>>>                             trunk on Linux x86_64:
>>>>
>>>>                                               $ cat test.cc
>>>>                                               #include <iostream>
>>>>                                               struct A { virtual ~A()
>>>> {} };
>>>>                                               struct B: virtual A {};
>>>>                                               struct C: virtual A {
>>>> ~C()
>>>>                             { std::cout << '\n'; } };
>>>>                                               struct D: virtual B,
>>>>                             virtual C {};
>>>>                                               int main() { delete new
>>>> D; }
>>>>
>>>>                                               $ clang++
>>>>                             -fsanitize=undefined test.cc
>>>>
>>>>                                               $ ./a.out
>>>>                                               <unknown>: runtime error:
>>>>                             member call on address
>>>>                                      0x000002a35010
>>>>                                               which does not point
>>>> to an
>>>>                             object of type 'A'
>>>>                                               0x000002a35010: note:
>>>>                             object has invalid vptr
>>>>                                                 00 00 00 00  58 0e
>>>> 43 00
>>>>                             00 00 00 00  30 0e 43 00 00
>>>>                                      00 00 00
>>>>                                                 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>>>                             e1 0f 02 00
>>>>
>>>>                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>                                                              invalid
>>>> vptr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                           The problem is that
>>>>                             getVtablePrefix
>>>>                                      (lib/ubsan/ubsan_type_hash.cc)
>>>>                                           rejects any VtablePrefix with
>>>>                             Offset > 0 as "This can't
>>>>                                      possibly be
>>>>                                           a valid vtable" but,
>>>> according
>>>>                             to the Itanium ABI, "in some
>>>>                                           construction virtual tables
>>>>                             will some virtual base virtual
>>>>                                      tables
>>>>                                           have positive offsets."
>>>>
>>>>                                           The apparent fix is to remove
>>>>                             the check, see the attached
>>>>                                           getVtablePrefix.patch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getVtablesPrefix.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1571 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150714/181e1844/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list