[PATCH] D11091: Actually support volatile memcpys in NVPTX lowering

Eli Bendersky eliben at google.com
Fri Jul 10 08:29:59 PDT 2015


eliben added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11091#202486, @jingyue wrote:

> LGTM
>
> More of a feature request, llvm.memcpy now takes alignments as arguments. We should emit larger loads/stores (e.g. st.u32 or even vector store) when alignments permit. Worth a TODO?


Yes, will do.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D11091







More information about the llvm-commits mailing list