[PATCH] Extend LoopVectorizationLegality::isConsecutivePtr to handle multiple level GEPs
qcolombet at apple.com
Wed Jun 17 11:40:12 PDT 2015
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote:
>> I assume that since you found that limitation, you have a test case that exposes it. Could you add the test case to the patch please?
> I add the testcase which is the same one as test/Transforms/InstCombine/gep-merge1.ll in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9865.
I do not understand. I thought that test case was to make sure that the geps inside the loop are well formed for the current loop vectorizer (i.e., without this patch).
> rL LLVM
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
More information about the llvm-commits