[zorg] r214540 - Fixed mergefunc builder configure; added lldb builder for FreeBSD.

[David Blaikie]

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Vince Harron <vince at nethacker.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Before you move them, can you explain what experimental means?
>

The significant thing to be, according to Galina, is that such a buildbot
won't send fail-mail to everyone on the blame list when it fails.


> The Linux builder does have some flakey builds and I'm working on that
> right now.
>

> I'm one test away from getting OSX green.  I would like to see how it does.
>

Seems fine - but I'd be happy to have it in experimental first, you can fix
it, wait to see a consistently good non-flaky behavior, then move it over.


> We are doing a bringup on the android builder right now, it makes sense to
> move that somewhere else.
>
> Also, it would be very much appreciated to include lldb-dev when
> discussing lldb issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vince
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >Perhaps everything should go in experimental first & only moved out once
>> they've got a track record of success.
>> Yes, this is good idea. I will move them to experimental.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11 May 2015 at 22:52, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hello everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm not sure I follow the discussion.
>>>> >
>>>> > Which builder are we talking about? Is it lldb-x86_64-freebsd?
>>>>
>>>> A few different things are being discussed in this thread.
>>>> lldb-x86_64-freebsd is the specific one of interest to me, but the
>>>> lldb builders are in general unreliable.
>>>>
>>>> > There were 3 failure e-mail notifications related to this particular
>>>> builder
>>>> > during the last month. The last notification looks valid, since the
>>>> build
>>>> > went from green to red
>>>> > (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5589
>>>> vs.
>>>> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5588).
>>>>
>>>> That green-to-red is almost certainly general flakiness, not directly
>>>> related to the changes in build 5589.
>>>>
>>>> > ...
>>>> > Or we are talking about all the builders in the whole "lldb"
>>>> category? If
>>>> > so, let's agree on how it should behave from the notification
>>>> perspective,
>>>> > and I'll configure it to do so.
>>>> >
>>>> > In general, any unreliable builder should be in the "experimental"
>>>> category.
>>>> > These are not sending notifications at all.
>>>>
>>>> It seems the unreliability / flakiness applies to all of the lldb
>>>> builders, other than the Windows ones which only build-test.  Does it
>>>> make sense to apply the experimental category to all of them for now?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps everything should go in experimental first & only moved out once
>>> they've got a track record of success. (& I wouldn't mind bumping a lot of
>>> existing builders back down to that category)
>>>
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150512/ba595cda/attachment.html>