[zorg] r214540 - Fixed mergefunc builder configure; added lldb builder for FreeBSD.

[Ed Maste]

On 8 May 2015 at 15:46, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 14:22, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Alternatively - could you just XFAIL all the current failures immediately
>> (bringing the buildbot to green, at least), then work on fixing them?
>
> Unfortunately it's not that easy to XFAIL the remaining four because
> they're being caught by a top-level timeout. I might have to just have
> them skipped for now.

Finally, we have one green build on the FreeBSD bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5588

For the sake of the archives, this is at r237010, and the build
completed with one warning:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libedit.so.0, needed by
/usr/home/buildslave/slave_as-bldslv5/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/llvm.obj/Release+Asserts/lib/liblldb.so,
may conflict with libedit.so.7

There's still flakiness in a handful of tests, at least when run on
the bot (which I believe has a consistently high load, and is good at
tripping over the races we have in LLDB).

That said, I can't find a successful build in the available history for any of:
lldb-x86_64-darwin-13.4
lldb-x86_64-debian-clang
lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-android
lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10

While judging by eye lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake seems to have
about a 50% success rate.

I'm trying to see about finding another FreeBSD LLDB buildslave I can
add that would be less loaded, since the test suite passes pretty
reliably for me on my own development machines on FreeBSD 10.x and
11.x. The flakiness and thread issues are real problems that will take
a lot of effort to fix, but at least having a consistent, lightly
loaded bot would help reduce the noise in ongoing development.