Nominating a patch for the 3.6.1 branch

[Lang Hames]

Hi Tom,

Yes - I think that's fine to pull in.

Cheers,
Lang.


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:

> Hi Lang,
>
> Is this commit OK to merge to the 3.6 branch:
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=234975
>
> -Tom
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Christian Schafmeister wrote:
> >
> > It was suggested that I include the svn commit number for the patch
> below:
> >
> > If I read the git log properly it was svn revision 234975
> >
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > I?d like to nominate this commit for the 3.6.1 branch.  It fixes a bug
> in the generation of JIT?d code that uses exception handling (if it
> delegates the exception handling to a function outside of the JIT?d code)
> but doesn?t refer to __eh_frames.  In that case, the __eh_frames segment
> gets dropped and the JIT?d code becomes a black hole for exceptions,
> exceptions cannot go through, come out of or go into the JIT?d code.
> > >
> > > I?m developing a Common Lisp compiler that uses LLVM as the back end
> and I need this patch for compiling code at the REPL.  I?ve tried upgrading
> to 3.7tot but a lot of changes have been made to DebugInfo and DIBuilder
> over the last couple of days and it?s going to take me a while to figure
> out how to adapt to them
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commit/a01f355245534c64dd144bd15c0f3292b856a751
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150428/2f95ce48/attachment.html>