[llvm] r234763 - DAGCombiner: Fix crash in select(select) opt.

[Matthias Braun]

But the intended check here is that the compiler doesn't crash. Why would I add an additional FileCheck?

- Matthias

> On Apr 13, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> 
>> On Apr 13, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Author: matze
>> Date: Mon Apr 13 12:16:33 2015
>> New Revision: 234763
>> 
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=234763&view=rev
>> Log:
>> DAGCombiner: Fix crash in select(select) opt.
>> 
>> In case of different types used for the condition of the selects the
>> select(select) -> select(and) normalisation cannot be performed.
>> 
>> See also: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7622
>> 
>> Added:
>>   llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/dagcombine_crash.ll
>> Modified:
>>   llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>> 
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp?rev=234763&r1=234762&r2=234763&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp Mon Apr 13 12:16:33 2015
>> @@ -4881,7 +4881,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSELECT(SDNode
>>      SDValue N1_0 = N1->getOperand(0);
>>      SDValue N1_1 = N1->getOperand(1);
>>      SDValue N1_2 = N1->getOperand(2);
>> -      if (N1_2 == N2) {
>> +      if (N1_2 == N2 && N0.getValueType() == N1_0.getValueType()) {
>>        // Create the actual and node if we can generate good code for it.
>>        if (!TLI.shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(*DAG.getContext(), VT)) {
>>          SDValue And = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, SDLoc(N), N0.getValueType(),
>> @@ -4900,7 +4900,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSELECT(SDNode
>>      SDValue N2_0 = N2->getOperand(0);
>>      SDValue N2_1 = N2->getOperand(1);
>>      SDValue N2_2 = N2->getOperand(2);
>> -      if (N2_1 == N1) {
>> +      if (N2_1 == N1 && N0.getValueType() == N2_0.getValueType()) {
>>        // Create the actual or node if we can generate good code for it.
>>        if (!TLI.shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(*DAG.getContext(), VT)) {
>>          SDValue Or = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, SDLoc(N), N0.getValueType(),
>> 
>> Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/dagcombine_crash.ll
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/dagcombine_crash.ll?rev=234763&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/dagcombine_crash.ll (added)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/dagcombine_crash.ll Mon Apr 13 12:16:33 2015
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +; RUN: llc -o - %s
> 
> Please add some, even trivial, check lines.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Quentin
> 
>> +; The selection DAG select(select()) normalisation crashed for different types
>> +; on the condition inputs.
>> +target datalayout = "E-m:m-p:32:32-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-n32-S64"
>> +target triple = "mips--"
>> +
>> +define i64 @foobar(double %a) #0 {
>> +entry:
>> +  %0 = bitcast double %a to i64
>> +  %trunc = trunc i64 %0 to i32
>> +  %and = and i32 %trunc, 32767
>> +  %sub = add nsw i32 %and, -16383
>> +  %cmp = icmp ugt i32 %and, 16382
>> +  %and5 = and i32 %trunc, 32768
>> +  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and5, 0
>> +  %or = and i1 %cmp, %tobool
>> +  %cmp6 = icmp ugt i32 %sub, 64
>> +  %sext = sext i1 %cmp6 to i64
>> +  %retval.0 = select i1 %or, i64 %sext, i64 0
>> +  ret i64 %retval.0
>> +}
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits