[patch][pr22947] Use sext in fast isel

[Rafael Espíndola]

On 6 April 2015 at 16:23, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> The changes to the mips fast isel test are worrying. From looking at the
> testcase it's materializing a constant 1 and you have it now materializing a
> constant -1 (extended) into the register.
>

I think that is a bug fix, no? "i1 1" is -1.

Cheers,
Rafael