[PATCH] Remove 4,096 loop scale limitation.

Diego Novillo dnovillo at google.com
Wed Apr 1 10:45:20 PDT 2015


On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
<dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:

> Given that we have 64-bits available (and in the absence of data), I
> would have chosen a large range (such as 60) and reduced it as necessary
> (and/or fixed optimizations that couldn't handle it).  Is there a reason
> you chose 32?

I was being too conservative here. I altered it slightly to use 64
bits and it seems to be working fine. I suspect, I'll have to tweak
this more at some point though.



Diego.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list