[PATCH] RegAllocGreedy: Allow target to specify register class ordering.

[James Molloy]

Hi Matthias,

Sorry, it's still unclear. Does high priority equal bigger numbers, or
numbers near zero? Both are common conventions and the text doesn't
disambiguate.

James
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 at 20:57, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote:

> The latest revision states this in the comments:
>
> "Classes with high priority are assigned first."
> and
> "Classes with high priority should be assigned first by register allocators
> with a greedy heuristic. The priority is a value in the range [0,63]."
> There is no menioning of "larger" any longer, I hope that is good enough.
>
> - Matthias
>
> > On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:49 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I please request that the documentation is clarified slightly as
> to which direction is higher priority? I know it says 'larger' but to me
> that's still a tad ambiguous.
> >
> > Sorry for nitpicking.
> >
> > James
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 at 20:40, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
> > LGTM.
> >
> >
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D8626
> >
> > EMAIL PREFERENCES
> >   http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150331/b07b33af/attachment.html>