[llvm] r232366 - [llvm] Replacing asserts with static_asserts where appropriate

Kostya Serebryany kcc at google.com
Tue Mar 17 12:16:21 PDT 2015


Agree, simplified the code in r232521.
Thanks!

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:

> +kcc
>
> > On 2015-Mar-16, at 02:53, Gabor Horvath <xazax.hun at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Author: xazax
> > Date: Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > New Revision: 232366
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=232366&view=rev
> > Log:
> > [llvm] Replacing asserts with static_asserts where appropriate
> >
> > Summary:
> > This patch consists of the suggestions of clang-tidy/misc-static-assert
> check.
> >
> >
> > Reviewers: alexfh
> >
> > Reviewed By: alexfh
> >
> > Subscribers: xazax.hun, llvm-commits
> >
> > Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8343
> >
> > Modified:
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SlotIndexes.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/MC/MCDwarf.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
> >    llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/SCCIteratorTest.cpp
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void MachineVerifier::verifyInlineAsm(co
> >   if (!isUInt<5>(MI->getOperand(1).getImm()))
> >     report("Unknown asm flags", &MI->getOperand(1), 1);
> >
> > -  assert(InlineAsm::MIOp_FirstOperand == 2 && "Asm format changed");
> > +  static_assert(InlineAsm::MIOp_FirstOperand == 2, "Asm format
> changed");
> >
> >   unsigned OpNo = InlineAsm::MIOp_FirstOperand;
> >   unsigned NumOps;
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SlotIndexes.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SlotIndexes.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SlotIndexes.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SlotIndexes.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void SlotIndexes::renumberIndexes() {
> > void SlotIndexes::renumberIndexes(IndexList::iterator curItr) {
> >   // Number indexes with half the default spacing so we can catch up
> quickly.
> >   const unsigned Space = SlotIndex::InstrDist/2;
> > -  assert((Space & 3) == 0 && "InstrDist must be a multiple of 2*NUM");
> > +  static_assert((Space & 3) == 0, "InstrDist must be a multiple of
> 2*NUM");
> >
> >   IndexList::iterator startItr = std::prev(curItr);
> >   unsigned index = startItr->getIndex();
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/MC/MCDwarf.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/MC/MCDwarf.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/MC/MCDwarf.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/MC/MCDwarf.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -243,7 +243,9 @@ std::pair<MCSymbol *, MCSymbol *> MCDwar
> >       0, // length of DW_LNS_set_epilogue_begin
> >       1  // DW_LNS_set_isa
> >   };
> > -  assert(array_lengthof(StandardOpcodeLengths) ==
> (DWARF2_LINE_OPCODE_BASE - 1));
> > +  static_assert(array_lengthof(StandardOpcodeLengths) ==
> > +                    (DWARF2_LINE_OPCODE_BASE - 1),
> > +                "");
> >   return Emit(MCOS, StandardOpcodeLengths);
> > }
> >
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ void FoldingSetNodeID::AddString(StringR
> >     // Otherwise do it the hard way.
> >     // To be compatible with above bulk transfer, we need to take
> endianness
> >     // into account.
> > +    static_assert(sys::IsBigEndianHost || sys::IsLittleEndianHost,
> > +                  "Unexpected host endianness");
> >     if (sys::IsBigEndianHost) {
> >       for (Pos += 4; Pos <= Size; Pos += 4) {
> >         unsigned V = ((unsigned char)String[Pos - 4] << 24) |
> > @@ -109,8 +111,7 @@ void FoldingSetNodeID::AddString(StringR
> >                       (unsigned char)String[Pos - 1];
> >         Bits.push_back(V);
> >       }
> > -    } else {
> > -      assert(sys::IsLittleEndianHost && "Unexpected host endianness");
> > +    } else {  // Little-endian host
> >       for (Pos += 4; Pos <= Size; Pos += 4) {
> >         unsigned V = ((unsigned char)String[Pos - 1] << 24) |
> >                      ((unsigned char)String[Pos - 2] << 16) |
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42
> 2015
> > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ bool FPS::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFu
> >   // function.  If it is all integer, there is nothing for us to do!
> >   bool FPIsUsed = false;
> >
> > -  assert(X86::FP6 == X86::FP0+6 && "Register enums aren't sorted
> right!");
> > +  static_assert(X86::FP6 == X86::FP0+6, "Register enums aren't sorted
> right!");
> >   for (unsigned i = 0; i <= 6; ++i)
> >     if (MF.getRegInfo().isPhysRegUsed(X86::FP0+i)) {
> >       FPIsUsed = true;
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42
> 2015
> > @@ -17841,7 +17841,8 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitVAARG64WithCustom
> >   // 9  ) EFLAGS (implicit-def)
> >
> >   assert(MI->getNumOperands() == 10 && "VAARG_64 should have 10
> operands!");
> > -  assert(X86::AddrNumOperands == 5 && "VAARG_64 assumes 5 address
> operands");
> > +  static_assert(X86::AddrNumOperands == 5,
> > +                "VAARG_64 assumes 5 address operands");
> >
> >   unsigned DestReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
> >   MachineOperand &Base = MI->getOperand(1);
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
> (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp Mon
> Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -1621,7 +1621,11 @@ static int StackMallocSizeClass(uint64_t
> > void FunctionStackPoisoner::SetShadowToStackAfterReturnInlined(
> >     IRBuilder<> &IRB, Value *ShadowBase, int Size) {
> >   assert(!(Size % 8));
> > -  assert(kAsanStackAfterReturnMagic == 0xf5);
> > +
> > +  #ifndef NDEBUG
> > +  static_assert(kAsanStackAfterReturnMagic == 0xf5, "");
> > +  #endif
> > +
>
> Is this really necessary?  I see that:
>
>     #ifndef NDEBUG
>     static const int kAsanStackAfterReturnMagic = 0xf5;
>     #endif
>
> Why not remove the `NDEBUG` from there?
>
> Moreover, why do we define a constant just to assert what its value is?
> Looking at the original commit (r190863), there was some commented out
> code using the variable, but it has since been removed.
>
> @kcc, should we remove this constant now?
>
> >   for (int i = 0; i < Size; i += 8) {
> >     Value *p = IRB.CreateAdd(ShadowBase, ConstantInt::get(IntptrTy, i));
> >     IRB.CreateStore(ConstantInt::get(IRB.getInt64Ty(),
> 0xf5f5f5f5f5f5f5f5ULL),
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/SCCIteratorTest.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/SCCIteratorTest.cpp?rev=232366&r1=232365&r2=232366&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/SCCIteratorTest.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/SCCIteratorTest.cpp Mon Mar 16 04:53:42 2015
> > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ TEST(SCCIteratorTest, AllSmallGraphs) {
> >   typedef Graph<NUM_NODES> GT;
> >
> >   /// Enumerate all graphs using NUM_GRAPHS bits.
> > -  assert(NUM_GRAPHS < sizeof(unsigned) * CHAR_BIT && "Too many
> graphs!");
> > +  static_assert(NUM_GRAPHS < sizeof(unsigned) * CHAR_BIT, "Too many
> graphs!");
> >   for (unsigned GraphDescriptor = 0; GraphDescriptor < (1U <<
> NUM_GRAPHS);
> >        ++GraphDescriptor) {
> >     GT G;
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150317/f2e7e5bf/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list