[PATCH] [lld] Revive standalone CMake build

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 11:09:28 PST 2015


My position remains that this isn't really that useful or worth the
maintenance burden that it brings. But I'm not really one of the primary
developers on LLD. I've just not had any trouble just enabling sanitizers
in the LLVM build to check LLD, nor have I heard complaints about this from
others.

That's why I'm silent here. If the LLD developers really want this, they
would probably show up and review it. My guess is that it doesn't solve an
important problem for them, but I can only speculate.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ping
>
>
> REPOSITORY
>   rL LLVM
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7625
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>   http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150223/795f51f0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list