[PATCH] [DOCS] Update the docs with regards to the removed LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION
dblaikie at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 17:13:34 PST 2015
We can probably just remove that whole section? When using = delete there's
no need to keep them private, for example. It's just the usual C++ language
feature, I don't think we have anything LLVM-specific to say here, but I
could be wrong.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Reading through the coding standards, I found a relic of an age long past.
> I have attached a patch which fixes this.
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits