[PATCH] [DOCS] Update the docs with regards to the removed LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION

David Blaikie dblaikie at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 17:13:34 PST 2015

We can probably just remove that whole section? When using = delete there's
no need to keep them private, for example. It's just the usual C++ language
feature, I don't think we have anything LLVM-specific to say here, but I
could be wrong.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Reading through the coding standards, I found a relic of an age long past.
> I have attached a patch which fixes this.
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150220/c701a618/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list