[PATCH] Check isTypeDesirableForOp before replacing mulhu/mulhs

[Owen Anderson]

I’m fine with the change in principle, but it would be good to get someone with more X86 knowledge to weigh in on the regression there.

—Owen

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ping
>>>> 
>>>> ping
>>> 
>>> 
>>> pre-branch ping
>> 
>> 
>> ping
> 
> ping
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150217/a59091d0/attachment.html>