[llvm] r228957 - Fix a crash in the assumption cache when inlining indirect function calls

Bjorn Steinbrink bsteinbr at gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 13:04:22 PST 2015


Author: bsteinbr
Date: Thu Feb 12 15:04:22 2015
New Revision: 228957

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=228957&view=rev
Log:
Fix a crash in the assumption cache when inlining indirect function calls

Summary:
Instances of the AssumptionCache are per function, so we can't re-use
the same AssumptionCache instance when recursing in the CallAnalyzer to
analyze a different function. Instead we have to pass the
AssumptionCacheTracker to the CallAnalyzer so it can get the right
AssumptionCache on demand.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: llvm-commits, hans

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7533

Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp?rev=228957&r1=228956&r2=228957&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp Thu Feb 12 15:04:22 2015
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ class CallAnalyzer : public InstVisitor<
   const TargetTransformInfo &TTI;
 
   /// The cache of @llvm.assume intrinsics.
-  AssumptionCache &AC;
+  AssumptionCacheTracker *ACT;
 
   // The called function.
   Function &F;
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ class CallAnalyzer : public InstVisitor<
 
 public:
   CallAnalyzer(const DataLayout *DL, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
-               AssumptionCache &AC, Function &Callee, int Threshold)
-      : DL(DL), TTI(TTI), AC(AC), F(Callee), Threshold(Threshold), Cost(0),
+               AssumptionCacheTracker *ACT, Function &Callee, int Threshold)
+      : DL(DL), TTI(TTI), ACT(ACT), F(Callee), Threshold(Threshold), Cost(0),
         IsCallerRecursive(false), IsRecursiveCall(false),
         ExposesReturnsTwice(false), HasDynamicAlloca(false),
         ContainsNoDuplicateCall(false), HasReturn(false), HasIndirectBr(false),
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ bool CallAnalyzer::visitCallSite(CallSit
   // during devirtualization and so we want to give it a hefty bonus for
   // inlining, but cap that bonus in the event that inlining wouldn't pan
   // out. Pretend to inline the function, with a custom threshold.
-  CallAnalyzer CA(DL, TTI, AC, *F, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold);
+  CallAnalyzer CA(DL, TTI, ACT, *F, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold);
   if (CA.analyzeCall(CS)) {
     // We were able to inline the indirect call! Subtract the cost from the
     // bonus we want to apply, but don't go below zero.
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ bool CallAnalyzer::analyzeCall(CallSite
   // the ephemeral values multiple times (and they're completely determined by
   // the callee, so this is purely duplicate work).
   SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 32> EphValues;
-  CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(&F, &AC, EphValues);
+  CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(&F, &ACT->getAssumptionCache(F), EphValues);
 
   // The worklist of live basic blocks in the callee *after* inlining. We avoid
   // adding basic blocks of the callee which can be proven to be dead for this
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ InlineCost InlineCostAnalysis::getInline
         << "...\n");
 
   CallAnalyzer CA(Callee->getDataLayout(), TTIWP->getTTI(*Callee),
-                  ACT->getAssumptionCache(*Callee), *Callee, Threshold);
+                  ACT, *Callee, Threshold);
   bool ShouldInline = CA.analyzeCall(CS);
 
   DEBUG(CA.dump());

Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll?rev=228957&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll Thu Feb 12 15:04:22 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -inline -disable-output 2>/dev/null
+; This test used to trigger an assertion in the assumption cache when
+; inlining the indirect call
+declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
+
+define void @foo() {
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @bar(void ()*) {
+  call void @llvm.assume(i1 true)
+  call void %0();
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @baz() {
+  call void @bar(void ()* @foo)
+  ret void
+}





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list