[PATCH] Have a way to let fast-isel handle normally optimized library functions

[reed kotler]

But I would still like to apply my patch first while we investigate that 
there is no unwanted ramifications
that would affect other ports.

On 02/09/2015 03:26 PM, reed kotler wrote:
> It seems from this history of this problem that we could just delete the
> code for all targets that my patch works around.
>
> It seems it was just a bandaid on another problem that was better solved
> by just adding a virtual method in fast-isel
> for handling intrinsics.
>
> Now that that is there, any intrinsic that a given port does not want to
> handle will get handled by reverting
> to non fast-isel.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7397
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>    http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>